Revisiting The Oxymoron: A Theoretical Discussion On Public Interest And Public Relations

Ebru Akçay
{"title":"Revisiting The Oxymoron: A Theoretical Discussion On Public Interest And Public Relations","authors":"Ebru Akçay","doi":"10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1189411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of public interest, which is used as a way for public relations to differentiate itself from propaganda or other negative connotations, is among the basic concepts utilized by public relations practitioners and academics working in the field of public relations. Compliments or criticisms of public relations are generally shaped by the discussion on whether public relations serve the public interest, although there is no direct reference to the concept. While mainstream approaches in public relations claim that public relations serve the public interest and the public interest is the raison d’être of public relations, critical approaches underline that public relations serve the market interest instead of the public interest. This study, which focuses on the public interest debates in the public relations literature with a theoretical discussion over the tobacco, alcohol, gambling, and confectionery industries, aims to examine the relation between public interest and public relations by opening the discussion on the axis of the concepts of dialogue, ethics, and democracy. In this context, the study claims that public relations cannot work the common good due to examples of the aforementioned industries that do not comply with the concept of public interest; however, public relations is a rhetorical instrument that makes corporations appear as if they serve the public interest.","PeriodicalId":33766,"journal":{"name":"Erciyes iletisim Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erciyes iletisim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.1189411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of public interest, which is used as a way for public relations to differentiate itself from propaganda or other negative connotations, is among the basic concepts utilized by public relations practitioners and academics working in the field of public relations. Compliments or criticisms of public relations are generally shaped by the discussion on whether public relations serve the public interest, although there is no direct reference to the concept. While mainstream approaches in public relations claim that public relations serve the public interest and the public interest is the raison d’être of public relations, critical approaches underline that public relations serve the market interest instead of the public interest. This study, which focuses on the public interest debates in the public relations literature with a theoretical discussion over the tobacco, alcohol, gambling, and confectionery industries, aims to examine the relation between public interest and public relations by opening the discussion on the axis of the concepts of dialogue, ethics, and democracy. In this context, the study claims that public relations cannot work the common good due to examples of the aforementioned industries that do not comply with the concept of public interest; however, public relations is a rhetorical instrument that makes corporations appear as if they serve the public interest.
重新审视矛盾修饰法:公共利益与公共关系的理论探讨
公共利益的概念是公共关系与宣传或其他负面内涵区分开来的一种方式,是公共关系从业人员和公共关系领域学者使用的基本概念之一。对公共关系的赞扬或批评通常是由公共关系是否服务于公共利益的讨论形成的,尽管没有直接提到这个概念。主流的公共关系理论认为公共关系服务于公众利益,公众利益是公共关系存在的理由être,而批判的公共关系理论则强调公共关系服务于市场利益而不是公众利益。本研究通过对烟草、酒精、赌博和糖果行业的理论讨论,重点关注公共关系文献中的公共利益辩论,旨在通过在对话、伦理和民主概念的轴心上展开讨论,来研究公共利益与公共关系之间的关系。在此背景下,该研究认为,由于上述行业的例子不符合公共利益的概念,公共关系不能为共同利益服务;然而,公共关系是一种修辞工具,使企业看起来好像是为公众利益服务的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信