"A Language Expert Protects True Values and National Interests": A Look into the Construction of Linguistic Expertise in the Metalinguistic Discourses in Lithuania and Serbia

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Vuk Vukotić
{"title":"\"A Language Expert Protects True Values and National Interests\": A Look into the Construction of Linguistic Expertise in the Metalinguistic Discourses in Lithuania and Serbia","authors":"Vuk Vukotić","doi":"10.18485/KKONLINE.2016.7.7.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linguists, language teachers and all other types of language experts are of key importance in the dissemination of beliefs about language, today referred to in literature as language ideologies (Rumsey, 1990). In spite of the great deal of attention given to language experts in sociolinguistic literature, very little research has looked into how these experts and their expertise is perceived amongst non - experts. A study of the perception of experts would help answer the question of how language ideologies c ome about, how are they formed by non - experts and are there any competing language ideologies, that language users come up with themselves. The aim of this paper is, thus, to explore the discursive construction of language experts amongst lay language user s. The data is drawn from online comment sections, and two communities are compared: Lithuania and Serbia. The research is qualitative, based on a relatively small number of comments, with the main goal to identify tendencies which could be examined in fur ther research. The analytical tools build upon the notion of interdiscursivity . Following Bauman (2005) is assumed that every utterance (or here: a comment) is created ideologically, by relying on recognisable ways of speaking, voicing and answering to discourses circulating in society. Such an analysis of the possible connections o f this discourse with other discourses could offer some explanation how language ideologies coming from language experts are perpetuated, negotiated or reconstructed.","PeriodicalId":37164,"journal":{"name":"Komunikacija i Kultura Online","volume":"7 1","pages":"155-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Komunikacija i Kultura Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/KKONLINE.2016.7.7.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linguists, language teachers and all other types of language experts are of key importance in the dissemination of beliefs about language, today referred to in literature as language ideologies (Rumsey, 1990). In spite of the great deal of attention given to language experts in sociolinguistic literature, very little research has looked into how these experts and their expertise is perceived amongst non - experts. A study of the perception of experts would help answer the question of how language ideologies c ome about, how are they formed by non - experts and are there any competing language ideologies, that language users come up with themselves. The aim of this paper is, thus, to explore the discursive construction of language experts amongst lay language user s. The data is drawn from online comment sections, and two communities are compared: Lithuania and Serbia. The research is qualitative, based on a relatively small number of comments, with the main goal to identify tendencies which could be examined in fur ther research. The analytical tools build upon the notion of interdiscursivity . Following Bauman (2005) is assumed that every utterance (or here: a comment) is created ideologically, by relying on recognisable ways of speaking, voicing and answering to discourses circulating in society. Such an analysis of the possible connections o f this discourse with other discourses could offer some explanation how language ideologies coming from language experts are perpetuated, negotiated or reconstructed.
“语言专家保护真正的价值和国家利益”:立陶宛和塞尔维亚元语言话语中的语言专家建构
语言学家、语言教师和所有其他类型的语言专家在传播关于语言的信念方面至关重要,今天在文学中被称为语言意识形态(拉姆齐,1990)。尽管在社会语言学文献中对语言专家给予了大量关注,但很少有研究关注这些专家及其专业知识在非专家中是如何被感知的。对专家感知的研究将有助于回答语言意识形态是如何产生的问题,它们是如何由非专家形成的,以及是否存在语言使用者自己提出的与之竞争的语言意识形态。因此,本文的目的是探索外行语言用户中语言专家的话语结构。数据来自在线评论部分,并比较了两个社区:立陶宛和塞尔维亚。该研究是定性的,基于相对较少的评论,其主要目标是确定可以在研究中检查的趋势。分析工具建立在话语间性的概念之上。根据鲍曼(2005)的假设,每一个话语(或这里的评论)都是意识形态上的创造,依靠可识别的说话方式,表达和回答社会中流传的话语。这种对这一话语与其他话语之间可能联系的分析,可以解释来自语言专家的语言意识形态是如何延续、协商或重建的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Komunikacija i Kultura Online
Komunikacija i Kultura Online Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信