{"title":"Sistema de recompensas como estratégia para melhorar a produtividade de colaboradores na Nigéria","authors":"Sunday Abayomi Adebisi, A. Oladipo","doi":"10.19177/REEN.V8E1201556-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper appraises reward system as a strategy for increasing employees’ productivity. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on employees’ productivity were measured by collating primary data through the use of multistage, stratified and random sampling techniques to sample respondents in University of Lagos. 400 copies of the questionnaire were administered but only 280 copies were recovered for analyses. Regression analyses findings showed coefficient results of: (R 2 )(0.361; (R 2 )(0.271); (R) 2 (0.180) (for hypotheses 1,2, and 3 respectively) to be significant at 0.05 level. The correlation coefficient of 0.386 for hypothesis 4 tested at 99% confident limit, revealed work input and extra rewards to be positively correlated","PeriodicalId":41816,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eletronica de Estrategia e Negocios-REEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eletronica de Estrategia e Negocios-REEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/REEN.V8E1201556-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper appraises reward system as a strategy for increasing employees’ productivity. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on employees’ productivity were measured by collating primary data through the use of multistage, stratified and random sampling techniques to sample respondents in University of Lagos. 400 copies of the questionnaire were administered but only 280 copies were recovered for analyses. Regression analyses findings showed coefficient results of: (R 2 )(0.361; (R 2 )(0.271); (R) 2 (0.180) (for hypotheses 1,2, and 3 respectively) to be significant at 0.05 level. The correlation coefficient of 0.386 for hypothesis 4 tested at 99% confident limit, revealed work input and extra rewards to be positively correlated