Evaluation of Input, Process, and Outputs of Ma’had Ali Program in Islamic Boarding School

F. Fadil
{"title":"Evaluation of Input, Process, and Outputs of Ma’had Ali Program in Islamic Boarding School","authors":"F. Fadil","doi":"10.21274/taalum.2020.8.1.119-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation research aimed at determining the condition of input, process, and output.  evaluation of Input is evaluation of conditions before the Ma'had Ali program was carried out. Process, evaluation of the program management process. Output of the Ma’had Ali Program, at this stage evaluation will be carried out on graduates. Its evaluation model was a countenance stake. The methods were used such as interviews, observation, questionnaires and assessment sheets that are structured for managers, students, lecturers, and alumni. The conclusions of this study were the evaluation of whole input components was in a bad category because the respondents who answered very good and good category were only 50.9% of 100%. W hereas, the evaluation of process components was in a good category because the frequency of very good and good category was 77.17% of 100%, While , the evaluation of the overall output component is in bad category because the frequency of very good and good category was 73.6% of 34 graduate s who answered the questionnaire. This shows that the overall output of the Ma’had Ali program has not reached the standard of a successful program .","PeriodicalId":55777,"journal":{"name":"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2020.8.1.119-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation research aimed at determining the condition of input, process, and output.  evaluation of Input is evaluation of conditions before the Ma'had Ali program was carried out. Process, evaluation of the program management process. Output of the Ma’had Ali Program, at this stage evaluation will be carried out on graduates. Its evaluation model was a countenance stake. The methods were used such as interviews, observation, questionnaires and assessment sheets that are structured for managers, students, lecturers, and alumni. The conclusions of this study were the evaluation of whole input components was in a bad category because the respondents who answered very good and good category were only 50.9% of 100%. W hereas, the evaluation of process components was in a good category because the frequency of very good and good category was 77.17% of 100%, While , the evaluation of the overall output component is in bad category because the frequency of very good and good category was 73.6% of 34 graduate s who answered the questionnaire. This shows that the overall output of the Ma’had Ali program has not reached the standard of a successful program .
伊斯兰寄宿学校玛哈德·阿里项目的投入、过程和产出评价
评价研究旨在确定投入、过程和产出的条件。输入的评估是在Ma'had Ali程序执行之前对条件的评估。过程,评价项目管理过程。马哈德·阿里项目的产出,在这一阶段将对毕业生进行评估。其评价模型为面容桩。采用访谈、观察、问卷调查和评估表等方法,为管理人员、学生、讲师和校友设计。本研究的结论是,由于回答非常好和好类别的受访者仅占100%的50.9%,因此整个输入组件的评估处于坏类别。其中,对过程成分的评价为好,因为非常好和好类别的频率为100%的77.17%;而对整体产出成分的评价为差,因为非常好和好类别的频率为73.6%回答问卷的34名毕业生。这表明,“马哈德·阿里”项目的整体产出还没有达到一个成功项目的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信