No sisyphean task: how the FDA can regulate electronic cigarettes.

J. Paradise
{"title":"No sisyphean task: how the FDA can regulate electronic cigarettes.","authors":"J. Paradise","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2118802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adverse effects of smoking have fostered a natural market for smoking cessation and smoking reduction products. Smokers attempting to quit or reduce consumption have tried everything: \"low\" or \"light\" cigarettes; nicotine-infused chewing gum, lozenges, and lollipops; dermal patches; and even hypnosis. The latest craze in the quest to find a safer source of nicotine is the electronic cigarette. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have swept the market, reaching a rapidly expanding international consumer base. Boasting nicotine delivery and the tactile feel of a traditional cigarette without the dozens of other chemical constituents that contribute to carcinogenicity, e-cigarettes are often portrayed as less risky, as a smoking reduction or even a complete smoking cessation product, and perhaps most troubling for its appeal to youth, as a flavorful, trendy, and convenient accessory. The sensationalism associated with e-cigarettes has spurred outcry from health and medical professional groups, as well as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), because of the unknown effects on public health. Inhabiting a realm of products deemed \"tobacco products\" under recent 2009 legislation, e-cigarettes pose new challenges to FDA regulation because of their novel method of nicotine delivery, various mechanical and electrical parts, and nearly nonexistent safety data. Consumer use, marketing and promotional claims, and technological characteristics of e-cigarettes have also raised decades old questions of when the FDA can assert authority over products as drugs or medical devices. Recent case law restricting FDA enforcement efforts against e-cigarettes further confounds the distinction among drugs and medical devices, emerging e-cigarette products, and traditional tobacco products such as cigarettes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco. This Article investigates the e-cigarette phenomenon in the wake of the recently enacted Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (TCA). It examines the tumultuous history of attempts at tobacco regulation by reflecting on the history of Congressional activity to regulate tobacco sales and promotion. Furthermore, this Article suggests a feasible approach to strengthening regulation of e-cigarettes under the existing statutory framework. This approach includes increased scrutiny of manufacturer and distributor claims that trigger drug and medical device provisions, utilization of new tobacco product and modified risk tobacco product provisions, and promulgation of new FDA regulations and guidance specifically directed at e-cigarettes.","PeriodicalId":85893,"journal":{"name":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","volume":"13 2 1","pages":"326-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2118802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The adverse effects of smoking have fostered a natural market for smoking cessation and smoking reduction products. Smokers attempting to quit or reduce consumption have tried everything: "low" or "light" cigarettes; nicotine-infused chewing gum, lozenges, and lollipops; dermal patches; and even hypnosis. The latest craze in the quest to find a safer source of nicotine is the electronic cigarette. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have swept the market, reaching a rapidly expanding international consumer base. Boasting nicotine delivery and the tactile feel of a traditional cigarette without the dozens of other chemical constituents that contribute to carcinogenicity, e-cigarettes are often portrayed as less risky, as a smoking reduction or even a complete smoking cessation product, and perhaps most troubling for its appeal to youth, as a flavorful, trendy, and convenient accessory. The sensationalism associated with e-cigarettes has spurred outcry from health and medical professional groups, as well as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), because of the unknown effects on public health. Inhabiting a realm of products deemed "tobacco products" under recent 2009 legislation, e-cigarettes pose new challenges to FDA regulation because of their novel method of nicotine delivery, various mechanical and electrical parts, and nearly nonexistent safety data. Consumer use, marketing and promotional claims, and technological characteristics of e-cigarettes have also raised decades old questions of when the FDA can assert authority over products as drugs or medical devices. Recent case law restricting FDA enforcement efforts against e-cigarettes further confounds the distinction among drugs and medical devices, emerging e-cigarette products, and traditional tobacco products such as cigarettes, cigars, and smokeless tobacco. This Article investigates the e-cigarette phenomenon in the wake of the recently enacted Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (TCA). It examines the tumultuous history of attempts at tobacco regulation by reflecting on the history of Congressional activity to regulate tobacco sales and promotion. Furthermore, this Article suggests a feasible approach to strengthening regulation of e-cigarettes under the existing statutory framework. This approach includes increased scrutiny of manufacturer and distributor claims that trigger drug and medical device provisions, utilization of new tobacco product and modified risk tobacco product provisions, and promulgation of new FDA regulations and guidance specifically directed at e-cigarettes.
没有西西弗斯式的任务:FDA如何监管电子烟。
吸烟的不良影响为戒烟和减少吸烟产品培育了一个自然的市场。试图戒烟或减少吸烟量的吸烟者尝试了各种方法:“低剂量”或“淡量”香烟;含尼古丁的口香糖、含片和棒棒糖;皮肤补丁;甚至催眠。寻找更安全的尼古丁来源的最新热潮是电子烟。电子烟(电子烟)席卷了市场,达到了一个迅速扩大的国际消费群体。电子烟拥有传统香烟的尼古丁传递和触感,而不含其他数十种致癌化学成分,因此电子烟通常被描述为风险较低,是一种减少吸烟甚至完全戒烟的产品,也许最令人不安的是,它对年轻人的吸引力,是一种美味、时尚和方便的配件。由于电子烟对公众健康的未知影响,与电子烟相关的耸人听闻行为引发了健康和医疗专业团体以及美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的强烈抗议。根据最近的2009年立法,电子烟属于“烟草产品”的范畴,由于其新颖的尼古丁输送方式、各种机械和电气部件以及几乎不存在的安全数据,电子烟对FDA的监管构成了新的挑战。消费者使用、营销和促销声明以及电子烟的技术特点也引发了一个几十年来一直存在的问题,即FDA何时可以对产品作为药物或医疗器械行使权力。最近的判例法限制了FDA对电子烟的执法力度,进一步混淆了药品和医疗器械、新兴电子烟产品和传统烟草产品(如香烟、雪茄和无烟烟草)之间的区别。本文调查了最近颁布的2009年家庭吸烟预防和烟草控制法案(TCA)之后的电子烟现象。它通过反思国会监管烟草销售和促销活动的历史,审视了烟草监管尝试的动荡历史。此外,本文还提出了在现有法律框架下加强对电子烟监管的可行方法。这一方法包括加强对制造商和分销商索赔的审查,以触发药物和医疗器械条款,新烟草产品的使用和修改的风险烟草产品条款,以及颁布新的FDA法规和专门针对电子烟的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信