DOMINANTS OF NATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN RUSSIA, GERMANY, AND THE USA

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-85-105

S. Kamolov, Anastasia Varos, Aleksandr Kriebitz, Mikhail Alashkevich

{"title":"DOMINANTS OF NATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN RUSSIA, GERMANY, AND THE USA","authors":"S. Kamolov, Anastasia Varos, Aleksandr Kriebitz, Mikhail Alashkevich","doi":"10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-85-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study based on multivariate comparative analysis identifies the dominants of national strategies for the development of artificial intelligence (AI) of the global superpowers. The article examines both structural similarities of strategic documents and fundamental differences in goal setting and functional expectations of sovereign AI technologies. Projecting fundamental ideas of technical and economic paradigms onto national strategies for the development of AI allows the authors to put forward a hypothesis concerning the formation of a common European, Russian and American proto-models of the AI development state policy. The dialectical nature of AI technologies demands consideration of the ethical aspects of the AI technologies application in Germany, Russia and the United States. As a result of the study, the foundations of various fundamental approaches of states to the development of AI technologies were established. Possible scenarios for the development of national strategic programs in the medium term globally were assessed.","PeriodicalId":43338,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-85-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study based on multivariate comparative analysis identifies the dominants of national strategies for the development of artificial intelligence (AI) of the global superpowers. The article examines both structural similarities of strategic documents and fundamental differences in goal setting and functional expectations of sovereign AI technologies. Projecting fundamental ideas of technical and economic paradigms onto national strategies for the development of AI allows the authors to put forward a hypothesis concerning the formation of a common European, Russian and American proto-models of the AI development state policy. The dialectical nature of AI technologies demands consideration of the ethical aspects of the AI technologies application in Germany, Russia and the United States. As a result of the study, the foundations of various fundamental approaches of states to the development of AI technologies were established. Possible scenarios for the development of national strategic programs in the medium term globally were assessed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

俄罗斯、德国和美国人工智能发展的国家战略优势

该研究基于多元比较分析，确定了全球超级大国人工智能发展的国家战略优势。本文考察了战略文件在结构上的相似性，以及主权人工智能技术在目标设定和功能期望方面的根本差异。将技术和经济范式的基本思想投射到人工智能发展的国家战略上，使作者能够提出一个关于形成欧洲、俄罗斯和美国共同的人工智能发展国家政策原型模型的假设。人工智能技术的辩证性质要求对德国、俄罗斯和美国人工智能技术应用的伦理问题进行思考。作为研究的结果，建立了各国发展人工智能技术的各种基本方法的基础。评估了全球中期制定国家战略方案的可能情景。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipalnogo Upravleniya-Public Administration Issues PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES is a scientific peer-reviewed journal published by the National Research University High School of Economics (NRU HSE).The journal is published quarterly in Russian, and contains original articles by Russian and foreign authors. In addition, a special English language issue containing original articles by Russian and foreign authors has been published since 2014. The editorial board consists of leading Russian and foreign scientists in the field of public administration as well as prominent practitioners. The journal is indexed in the international databases: Scopus, RePEc, EBSCOand the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) on the platform of Web of Science. In addition, the journal is on the list of key peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications that the Higher Certification (Attestation) Commission in the RF Education Ministry recommends for publishing the main scientific results of theses for PhD and doctoral degrees in Economics, Sociology and Law. The journal focuses on the following subject areas: − Current theories of public administration. − Theoretical fundamentals of economic and social policy − Factors and Assessment of efficiency in public and municipal administration. − Innovations in the system of public and municipal administration. − Planning and forecasting in the system of public and municipal administration. − Staff of the state and municipal service. Management of personnel in public and municipal bodies and in organizations of the public sectors. − Financial, logistical and information resources of the state and municipalities. − Public service. − Functional features of public sector organizations. − Partnership of the state and municipalities with nongovernmental nonprofit organizations. Economic and administrative challenges facing “third sector.” - Development of education programs on public administration.