Hold On: The Remarkably Resilient, Constitutionally Dubious '48-Hour Hold'

Steven J. Mulroy
{"title":"Hold On: The Remarkably Resilient, Constitutionally Dubious '48-Hour Hold'","authors":"Steven J. Mulroy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2101137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, various local jurisdictions used (and in some areas, still use) a constitutionally suspect procedure called a \"48-hour hold.\" A suspect is detained for up to 48 hours without charge while an investigation continues; after 48 hours, the suspect is either charged or released. The practice continues despite occasional criticism by courts, the bar, and the press. In many cases, this practice unconstitutionally detains persons without probable cause. Even where probable cause exists, the practice improperly circumvents rights to get bail, to get a prompt bail determination, and to be free of interrogation without the presence of counsel. While similar procedures may occur in other countries, it is contrary to American principles of criminal justice. Understanding why may also help in current debates over the proposed use of \"investigative holds\" of terrorism suspects.","PeriodicalId":80897,"journal":{"name":"Case Western Reserve law review","volume":"194 1","pages":"815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Western Reserve law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2101137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For decades, various local jurisdictions used (and in some areas, still use) a constitutionally suspect procedure called a "48-hour hold." A suspect is detained for up to 48 hours without charge while an investigation continues; after 48 hours, the suspect is either charged or released. The practice continues despite occasional criticism by courts, the bar, and the press. In many cases, this practice unconstitutionally detains persons without probable cause. Even where probable cause exists, the practice improperly circumvents rights to get bail, to get a prompt bail determination, and to be free of interrogation without the presence of counsel. While similar procedures may occur in other countries, it is contrary to American principles of criminal justice. Understanding why may also help in current debates over the proposed use of "investigative holds" of terrorism suspects.
坚持:具有很强的弹性,宪法上可疑的“48小时坚持”
几十年来,各个地方司法管辖区使用(在某些地区仍然使用)一种宪法上可疑的程序,称为“48小时拘留”。在调查继续期间,嫌疑人可以在没有指控的情况下被拘留48小时;48小时后,嫌疑人要么被起诉,要么被释放。尽管偶尔会受到法院、律师协会和媒体的批评,这种做法仍在继续。在许多情况下,这种做法违反宪法,在没有合理理由的情况下拘留人。即使存在可能的理由,这种做法也不恰当地规避了获得保释、迅速确定保释的权利,以及在没有律师在场的情况下不受讯问的权利。虽然其他国家也可能有类似的程序,但这违反了美国的刑事司法原则。理解其中的原因也可能有助于解决目前关于对恐怖主义嫌疑人使用“调查拘留”的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书