Обеспечение качества высшего образования

А М Алексанков, В Е Магер, Л В Черненькая, А В Черненький
{"title":"Обеспечение качества высшего образования","authors":"А М Алексанков, В Е Магер, Л В Черненькая, А В Черненький","doi":"10.21686/1818-4243-2016-4-10-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article expounds questions concerning Quality assurance of Higher education, related to the entry of Russia into the united European Higher Education Area. The main emphases is focused on the necessity to create the system for Quality assurance of Russian Higher education, which will be harmonized with European systems. Comparing of Russian and European approaches in Quality assurance of Higher education is drawn. Russian system of Quality assurance of Higher education is considered on four levels: State level, level of Higher educational institution, level of society and international level; for each level the main elements of a system are determined. Since the European approach separates the Quality assurance system into two levels, e.g. internal and external, a conversion to comparable levels is being proposed. Characteristics of EURopean ACcredited Engineer (EUR-ACE) Framework Standards are expounded. These Standards have been developed, fi rst of all, for facilitation of the procedure of acceptance of degrees and qualifi cations as well as Quality assurance of Study Programmes in European Higher Education Area. The comparison of requirements of Federal State Educational Standards for Higher education in Russian Federation and EUR-ACE Framework Standards is produced on the example of Masters’ Study programmes in Engineering. The comparison exposed similarities and, at the same time, considerable differences in examined approaches. So, the results of studies are formulated in different “coordinate systems”: according with kinds of activities in Federal State Educational Standards for Higher education, but according to the “cycle” of Engineering activity in EURACE Framework Standards. However, if the task for harmonization of standards (or requirements) could be considered out of just simple coincidence between their structures and/or definitions and terms, than the principle contradictions between European and Russian approaches in Quality assurance will not appear. It means that the ways of harmonization of European and Russian requirements to Study Programmes’ Quality assurance could be found. And the logical part of implementation of international Quality management schemes will be the accreditation of Russian Study programmes in international organizations and networks. In order to ensure the effectiveness of such tasks, it is necessary to develop an appropriate tools, which could help to formalize and systematize procedures of Study Programmes’ Quality assurance with a glance of requirements of European standards. The experience of St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU) on Quality assurance of Study Programmes is discussed, in particular: development and appraisal of Technique for monitoring of Study Programmes and of the Model for on-line Quality Assurance of Study Programmes with a glance of requirements of European standards, which have been created in frames of the project TEMPUS EQUASP («On-line (Electronic) Quality Assurance of Study Programmes») with participation of SPbPU. Implementation of proposed tools ensures the integrity and authenticity of information on all aspects of the realization of educational process, fulfi llment of all-European requirements on Study Programmes’ accreditation, harmonization of Russian and European Higher education systems, and, thus, forms the basis for Study Programmes’ accreditation in international organizations and networks. The Model for on-line Quality Assurance of Study Programmes is a powerful tool, which allows to bring the process of Quality Assurance of Study Programmes into accord with European standards and guidelines, to improve quality of Programmes, to increase their transparency and comparability.","PeriodicalId":55672,"journal":{"name":"Otkrytoe Obrazovanie Moskva","volume":"10 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otkrytoe Obrazovanie Moskva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2016-4-10-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The article expounds questions concerning Quality assurance of Higher education, related to the entry of Russia into the united European Higher Education Area. The main emphases is focused on the necessity to create the system for Quality assurance of Russian Higher education, which will be harmonized with European systems. Comparing of Russian and European approaches in Quality assurance of Higher education is drawn. Russian system of Quality assurance of Higher education is considered on four levels: State level, level of Higher educational institution, level of society and international level; for each level the main elements of a system are determined. Since the European approach separates the Quality assurance system into two levels, e.g. internal and external, a conversion to comparable levels is being proposed. Characteristics of EURopean ACcredited Engineer (EUR-ACE) Framework Standards are expounded. These Standards have been developed, fi rst of all, for facilitation of the procedure of acceptance of degrees and qualifi cations as well as Quality assurance of Study Programmes in European Higher Education Area. The comparison of requirements of Federal State Educational Standards for Higher education in Russian Federation and EUR-ACE Framework Standards is produced on the example of Masters’ Study programmes in Engineering. The comparison exposed similarities and, at the same time, considerable differences in examined approaches. So, the results of studies are formulated in different “coordinate systems”: according with kinds of activities in Federal State Educational Standards for Higher education, but according to the “cycle” of Engineering activity in EURACE Framework Standards. However, if the task for harmonization of standards (or requirements) could be considered out of just simple coincidence between their structures and/or definitions and terms, than the principle contradictions between European and Russian approaches in Quality assurance will not appear. It means that the ways of harmonization of European and Russian requirements to Study Programmes’ Quality assurance could be found. And the logical part of implementation of international Quality management schemes will be the accreditation of Russian Study programmes in international organizations and networks. In order to ensure the effectiveness of such tasks, it is necessary to develop an appropriate tools, which could help to formalize and systematize procedures of Study Programmes’ Quality assurance with a glance of requirements of European standards. The experience of St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU) on Quality assurance of Study Programmes is discussed, in particular: development and appraisal of Technique for monitoring of Study Programmes and of the Model for on-line Quality Assurance of Study Programmes with a glance of requirements of European standards, which have been created in frames of the project TEMPUS EQUASP («On-line (Electronic) Quality Assurance of Study Programmes») with participation of SPbPU. Implementation of proposed tools ensures the integrity and authenticity of information on all aspects of the realization of educational process, fulfi llment of all-European requirements on Study Programmes’ accreditation, harmonization of Russian and European Higher education systems, and, thus, forms the basis for Study Programmes’ accreditation in international organizations and networks. The Model for on-line Quality Assurance of Study Programmes is a powerful tool, which allows to bring the process of Quality Assurance of Study Programmes into accord with European standards and guidelines, to improve quality of Programmes, to increase their transparency and comparability.
高等教育质量保证
文章阐述了俄罗斯加入欧洲高等教育联合区有关高等教育质量保证的问题。主要的重点是建立俄罗斯高等教育质量保证体系的必要性,该体系将与欧洲体系相协调。比较了俄罗斯和欧洲在高等教育质量保证方面的做法。俄罗斯的高等教育质量保证体系分为四个层面:国家层面、高等教育机构层面、社会层面和国际层面;对于每个级别,确定了系统的主要元素。由于欧洲办法将质量保证制度分为两个层次,例如内部和外部,因此正在提议转换为可比较的层次。阐述了欧洲认证工程师(EUR-ACE)框架标准的特点。这些标准的制定,首先是为了促进学位和资格的接受程序,以及欧洲高等教育区学习计划的质量保证。俄罗斯联邦高等教育联邦国家教育标准和欧盟- ace框架标准的要求比较是以工程硕士研究项目为例进行的。比较揭示了相似之处,同时,在检查的方法相当大的差异。因此,研究结果是在不同的“坐标系”中制定的:根据联邦州高等教育标准中的各种活动,但根据EURACE框架标准中的工程活动的“周期”。然而,如果标准(或需求)的协调任务可以仅仅从其结构和/或定义和术语之间的简单巧合中考虑,那么欧洲和俄罗斯在质量保证方面的方法之间的主要矛盾就不会出现。这意味着可以找到协调欧洲和俄罗斯对学习方案质量保证要求的方法。实施国际质量管理计划的逻辑部分将是在国际组织和网络中对俄罗斯学习计划进行认证。为了确保这些任务的有效性,有必要开发一种适当的工具,它可以帮助在了解欧洲标准要求的情况下,使学习项目质量保证程序正规化和系统化。讨论了圣彼得堡理工大学(SPbPU)在学习项目质量保证方面的经验,特别是:学习项目监测技术的开发和评估以及学习项目在线质量保证模式的开发和评估,该模式是在圣彼得堡理工大学参与的TEMPUS EQUASP(“在线(电子)学习项目质量保证”)项目框架内创建的。实施拟议的工具确保了教育过程实现各方面信息的完整性和真实性,满足了全欧洲对学习计划认证的要求,协调了俄罗斯和欧洲高等教育系统,从而构成了学习计划在国际组织和网络中认证的基础。在线学习课程质量保证模式是一个强大的工具,它可以使学习课程质量保证过程符合欧洲标准和指导方针,提高课程质量,增加透明度和可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信