Current Considerations for Dental Ceramics and Their Respective Union Systems

J. Matos, L. Nakano, M. Bottino, Ricardo Huver de Jesus, Lucas Campagnaro Maciel
{"title":"Current Considerations for Dental Ceramics and Their Respective Union Systems","authors":"J. Matos, L. Nakano, M. Bottino, Ricardo Huver de Jesus, Lucas Campagnaro Maciel","doi":"10.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to evaluate the main characteristics of dental ceramics, resin cements, surface treatments and verification of their failure modes, in relation to the literature and their respective clinical uses. Material and Methods: a bibliographic search was conducted in the main health databases PUBMED (www.pubmed.gov) and Scholar Google (www.scholar.google.com.br), in which studies published from 2002 to 2020 were collected. Laboratory studies, case reports, systematic and literature reviews, which were developed in living individuals, were included. Therefore, articles that did not deal with the main characteristics of dental ceramics, resin cements, surface treatments and verification of their failure modes, in relation to the literature and their respective clinical uses were excluded. Results: ceramics can be classified into glass-matrix ceramics, polycrystalline ceramics and hybrid ceramics. Just as there are different compositions of ceramics and bonding agents, there are also some surface treatment protocols that vary according to the choice of these materials. Conclusion: several ceramic systems are available, making professionals in the prosthetic area need a constant update about their properties and indications, since good results are not due exclusively to the type of material used, but also to the selection of the best material, type of preparation, professional’s skill, resin cements, surface treatments and verification of their failure modes. In this context, further studies are needed in relation to dental ceramics and their proper clinical use.","PeriodicalId":53157,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Odontologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the main characteristics of dental ceramics, resin cements, surface treatments and verification of their failure modes, in relation to the literature and their respective clinical uses. Material and Methods: a bibliographic search was conducted in the main health databases PUBMED (www.pubmed.gov) and Scholar Google (www.scholar.google.com.br), in which studies published from 2002 to 2020 were collected. Laboratory studies, case reports, systematic and literature reviews, which were developed in living individuals, were included. Therefore, articles that did not deal with the main characteristics of dental ceramics, resin cements, surface treatments and verification of their failure modes, in relation to the literature and their respective clinical uses were excluded. Results: ceramics can be classified into glass-matrix ceramics, polycrystalline ceramics and hybrid ceramics. Just as there are different compositions of ceramics and bonding agents, there are also some surface treatment protocols that vary according to the choice of these materials. Conclusion: several ceramic systems are available, making professionals in the prosthetic area need a constant update about their properties and indications, since good results are not due exclusively to the type of material used, but also to the selection of the best material, type of preparation, professional’s skill, resin cements, surface treatments and verification of their failure modes. In this context, further studies are needed in relation to dental ceramics and their proper clinical use.
目前对牙科陶瓷及其各自结合系统的考虑
目的:结合文献及临床应用,评价牙陶瓷、树脂胶合剂的主要特点、表面处理方法及失效模式的验证。材料和方法:在主要卫生数据库PUBMED (www.pubmed.gov)和Scholar谷歌(www.scholar.google.com.br)中进行书目检索,收集2002年至2020年发表的研究。包括在世个体的实验室研究、病例报告、系统和文献综述。因此,不涉及牙科陶瓷、树脂水泥的主要特性、表面处理及其失效模式验证的文献及其临床应用的文章被排除。结果:陶瓷可分为玻璃基陶瓷、多晶陶瓷和杂化陶瓷。正如有不同的陶瓷和粘合剂组成,也有一些表面处理方案,根据这些材料的选择而变化。结论:有几种陶瓷系统可用,使得假肢领域的专业人员需要不断更新其性能和适应症,因为良好的效果不仅取决于所使用的材料类型,还取决于最佳材料的选择、制备类型、专业人员的技能、树脂水泥、表面处理和失效模式的验证。在此背景下,需要进一步研究牙科陶瓷及其临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信