M&A Fiduciary Duties: Delaware's Murky Jurisprudence

D. Morrissey
{"title":"M&A Fiduciary Duties: Delaware's Murky Jurisprudence","authors":"D. Morrissey","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2070189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the fiduciary duties of corporate officials in mergers and acquisitions, particularly as they have been defined by the Delaware Courts. It focuses on judicial decisions over the last several decades and includes a discussion of some of the most recent significant ones.The article also describes how those duties may vary depending on the type of corporate event that is occurring and contains commentary on the nature of those obligations. Where corrupt activity is present or there is no showing that these transactions are in the public interest, they should not be permitted to go forward. If Delaware Courts are not willing to stop them, the article proposes a system of more meaningful review to accomplish that.","PeriodicalId":83467,"journal":{"name":"Villanova law review","volume":"58 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Villanova law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2070189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article deals with the fiduciary duties of corporate officials in mergers and acquisitions, particularly as they have been defined by the Delaware Courts. It focuses on judicial decisions over the last several decades and includes a discussion of some of the most recent significant ones.The article also describes how those duties may vary depending on the type of corporate event that is occurring and contains commentary on the nature of those obligations. Where corrupt activity is present or there is no showing that these transactions are in the public interest, they should not be permitted to go forward. If Delaware Courts are not willing to stop them, the article proposes a system of more meaningful review to accomplish that.
并购信托责任:特拉华州的模糊法理学
该条涉及公司官员在合并和收购中的受托责任,特别是特拉华州法院对这些责任的定义。它侧重于过去几十年的司法判决,并包括对最近一些重要判决的讨论。本文还描述了这些义务如何根据正在发生的公司事件的类型而变化,并对这些义务的性质进行了评论。如果存在贪污行为,或没有证据显示这些交易符合公众利益,就不应允许这些交易进行。如果特拉华州法院不愿意阻止他们,文章提出了一种更有意义的审查制度来实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书