Carotid Ultrasound in One, Two and Three Dimensions

R. Hegele, K. Al-Shali, Hafiz M. R. Khan, A. Hanley, S. Harris, M. Mamakeesick, B. Zinman, A. Fenster, J. Spence, A. House
{"title":"Carotid Ultrasound in One, Two and Three Dimensions","authors":"R. Hegele, K. Al-Shali, Hafiz M. R. Khan, A. Hanley, S. Harris, M. Mamakeesick, B. Zinman, A. Fenster, J. Spence, A. House","doi":"10.2174/1567270000502010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultrasound measurements of the carotid wall are widely used surrogate markers for atherosclerosis with the intima-media thickness (IMT) being the most commonly measured variable. However, ultrasound has recently defined carotid artery wall structures in higher spatial dimensions, such as total area of carotid plaques (TPA) and total volume of carotid plaques (TPV). It is possible that IMT, TPA and TPV measure different aspects of the atherosclerotic process and thus have different clinical implications. IMT, TPA and TPV have never been correlated in the same individuals. We had a unique dataset in which IMT, TPA and TPV were measured concurrently in 272 subjects. We evaluated the left and right carotid arterial systems in each subject as independent variables and performed three pairwise correlation analyses between IMT and transformed TPA and TPV from the 544 carotid arterial systems. We found pairwise correlations between IMT and square root TPA, IMT and cubic root TPV and square root TPA and cubic root TPV; these correlation coefficients were 0.667, 0.586 and 0.963, respectively (all P<0.0001). However, correlation graphs showed marked scatter of individual data points. Thus, IMT was only moderately well correlated with TPA and TPV, but TPA and TPV were very strongly correlated with each other. This suggests that IMT is less related to TPA and TPV than they are to each other and could reflect somewhat different aspects of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, the high correlation between TPA and TPV suggests that both might not need to be measured together in future analyses.","PeriodicalId":88793,"journal":{"name":"Vascular disease prevention","volume":"2 1","pages":"87-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular disease prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1567270000502010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Ultrasound measurements of the carotid wall are widely used surrogate markers for atherosclerosis with the intima-media thickness (IMT) being the most commonly measured variable. However, ultrasound has recently defined carotid artery wall structures in higher spatial dimensions, such as total area of carotid plaques (TPA) and total volume of carotid plaques (TPV). It is possible that IMT, TPA and TPV measure different aspects of the atherosclerotic process and thus have different clinical implications. IMT, TPA and TPV have never been correlated in the same individuals. We had a unique dataset in which IMT, TPA and TPV were measured concurrently in 272 subjects. We evaluated the left and right carotid arterial systems in each subject as independent variables and performed three pairwise correlation analyses between IMT and transformed TPA and TPV from the 544 carotid arterial systems. We found pairwise correlations between IMT and square root TPA, IMT and cubic root TPV and square root TPA and cubic root TPV; these correlation coefficients were 0.667, 0.586 and 0.963, respectively (all P<0.0001). However, correlation graphs showed marked scatter of individual data points. Thus, IMT was only moderately well correlated with TPA and TPV, but TPA and TPV were very strongly correlated with each other. This suggests that IMT is less related to TPA and TPV than they are to each other and could reflect somewhat different aspects of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, the high correlation between TPA and TPV suggests that both might not need to be measured together in future analyses.
颈动脉超声在一,二,三维
超声测量颈动脉壁被广泛用于动脉粥样硬化的替代标志物,内膜-中膜厚度(IMT)是最常用的测量变量。然而,最近超声在更高的空间维度上定义了颈动脉壁结构,如颈动脉斑块总面积(TPA)和颈动脉斑块总量(TPV)。IMT、TPA和TPV可能测量动脉粥样硬化过程的不同方面,因此具有不同的临床意义。IMT, TPA和TPV在同一个体中从未相关。我们有一个独特的数据集,其中同时测量了272名受试者的IMT, TPA和TPV。我们将每个受试者的左右颈动脉系统作为自变量进行评估,并在IMT与544个颈动脉系统的TPA和TPV之间进行了三次两两相关分析。我们发现IMT与平方根TPA、IMT与平方根TPV、平方根TPA与平方根TPV呈两两相关;相关系数分别为0.667、0.586、0.963(均P<0.0001)。然而,相关图显示了个别数据点的明显分散。因此,IMT与TPA和TPV的相关性仅为中等,而TPA和TPV之间的相关性非常强。这表明IMT与TPA和TPV的相关性不如它们之间的相关性,并且可能反映动脉粥样硬化的不同方面。此外,TPA和TPV之间的高度相关性表明,在未来的分析中可能不需要同时测量两者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信