“More than learning”: Teaching and learning ethics within an electrical engineering undergraduate capstone course

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-11-01
Alison J. Gwynne-Evans
{"title":"“More than learning”: Teaching and learning ethics within an electrical engineering undergraduate capstone course","authors":"Alison J. Gwynne-Evans","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How learning is conceptualized and negotiated within the engineering undergraduate curriculum is affected by the theory of learning implicit in the design of the curriculum. The shift to online learning due to restrictions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic provides the opportunity to make visible aspects of the curriculum that were previously hidden. The paper presents evidence of student learning relating to ethics found in student assignments submitted in partial fulfillment of a capstone course that forms part of the undergraduate program for Electrical Engineering at the University of Cape Town. Evidence of student learning will be linked to three distinct theories of learning that are presented and contrasted as metaphors: a theory of learning that assumes transference and is acquisition-based; a theory of learning that assumes transference by means of participation within a community and a theory of learning that is activity-centered and aims to be transformative. Each of these theories will be linked to particular teaching approaches and assessment strategies. The learning theories provide a frame to examine evidence of student learning relating to ethics in a particular context. This process justifies an expanded conception of learning relating to ethics in engineering.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8475037/9580763/09580770.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9580770/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How learning is conceptualized and negotiated within the engineering undergraduate curriculum is affected by the theory of learning implicit in the design of the curriculum. The shift to online learning due to restrictions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic provides the opportunity to make visible aspects of the curriculum that were previously hidden. The paper presents evidence of student learning relating to ethics found in student assignments submitted in partial fulfillment of a capstone course that forms part of the undergraduate program for Electrical Engineering at the University of Cape Town. Evidence of student learning will be linked to three distinct theories of learning that are presented and contrasted as metaphors: a theory of learning that assumes transference and is acquisition-based; a theory of learning that assumes transference by means of participation within a community and a theory of learning that is activity-centered and aims to be transformative. Each of these theories will be linked to particular teaching approaches and assessment strategies. The learning theories provide a frame to examine evidence of student learning relating to ethics in a particular context. This process justifies an expanded conception of learning relating to ethics in engineering.
“不止是学习”:电气工程本科顶尖课程中的教学伦理
工程本科课程中学习的概念化和协商方式受到课程设计中隐含的学习理论的影响。由于新冠肺炎疫情带来的限制,向在线学习的转变提供了一个机会,让人们看到以前隐藏的课程。该论文提供了学生在完成开普敦大学电气工程本科生课程的一部分时提交的部分作业中发现的与道德相关的学习证据。学生学习的证据将与三种不同的学习理论联系起来,这三种理论被作为隐喻提出和对比:一种假设迁移和基于习得的学习理论;一种通过参与社区来假设迁移的学习理论,以及一种以活动为中心并旨在变革的学习理论。这些理论中的每一个都将与特定的教学方法和评估策略相联系。学习理论提供了一个框架来检验学生在特定背景下与道德相关的学习证据。这一过程证明了与工程伦理相关的学习概念的扩展是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信