Aristides did not Read Strabo: Ethiopian Rains in the Aigyptios

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Aja Sánchez, J. Ramón
{"title":"Aristides did not Read Strabo: Ethiopian Rains in the Aigyptios","authors":"Aja Sánchez, J. Ramón","doi":"10.2143/AS.46.0.3167452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aristides was one among the ancient writers who mistakenly rejected the theory that related the seasonal rains on the Ethiopian mountains to the origin of the Nilotic flood, a link that we know today to be closer to the truth than any other ancient theory. The Nile’s two singularities drove Aristides to commit two severe methodological mistakes, which are particularly noticeable in an intellectual of his category: the hydric behavior of the current (apparently opposed to that of other rivers) and the spatial and temporal discrepancy between the atmospheric factors that caused the rising of the river and the perception of said rising in Egypt. Aristides’ forceful rejection of this theory is one of the most interesting factors in the text and one that I shall use in order to define which elements in the Aigyptios are in fact correct and which are not.","PeriodicalId":35090,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"73-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/AS.46.0.3167452","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/AS.46.0.3167452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aristides was one among the ancient writers who mistakenly rejected the theory that related the seasonal rains on the Ethiopian mountains to the origin of the Nilotic flood, a link that we know today to be closer to the truth than any other ancient theory. The Nile’s two singularities drove Aristides to commit two severe methodological mistakes, which are particularly noticeable in an intellectual of his category: the hydric behavior of the current (apparently opposed to that of other rivers) and the spatial and temporal discrepancy between the atmospheric factors that caused the rising of the river and the perception of said rising in Egypt. Aristides’ forceful rejection of this theory is one of the most interesting factors in the text and one that I shall use in order to define which elements in the Aigyptios are in fact correct and which are not.
阿里斯蒂德没有读过斯特拉波的《埃及的埃塞俄比亚雨》
阿里斯蒂德斯是古代作家之一,他错误地拒绝了将埃塞俄比亚山脉的季节性降雨与尼罗河洪水的起源联系起来的理论,我们今天知道,这种联系比任何其他古代理论都更接近事实。尼罗河的两个奇点促使阿里斯蒂德斯犯了两个严重的方法论错误,这在他这类知识分子中尤为明显:水流的水力行为(显然与其他河流的水力行为相反),以及导致尼罗河水位上升的大气因素与埃及人对水位上升的感知之间的时空差异。阿里斯蒂德对这一理论的强烈拒绝是文本中最有趣的因素之一,我将用它来定义埃及的哪些元素实际上是正确的,哪些是错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ancient Society
Ancient Society Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信