Structural Funding and Disadvantage of Regions: Public and Non-Public Beneficiaries

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
Oldřich Hájek, J. Novosák, R. Jurčík, Daniela Spiesová, Jana Novosáková
{"title":"Structural Funding and Disadvantage of Regions: Public and Non-Public Beneficiaries","authors":"Oldřich Hájek, J. Novosák, R. Jurčík, Daniela Spiesová, Jana Novosáková","doi":"10.18267/j.polek.1238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural Funding and Disadvantage of Regions: Public and Non-Public Beneficiaries Considering the differences between public and non-public beneficiaries, the main aim of this paper is to evaluate the relationship between the disadvantage of Czech regions and the spatial distribution of EU structural funds in the programming period 2007–2013. The empirical results reveal negative and significant influence of socioeconomic disadvantage of regions on the amount of structural funds obtained by public beneficiaries. On the contrary, agglomeration economies are the statistically significant determinant of the amount of structural funds obtained by non-public beneficiaries. These conclusions are related to different absorption capacity of regions, regarding the number and size of projects. Overall, structural funds do not compensate for the disadvantage of regions, neither for public nor for non-public beneficiaries.","PeriodicalId":44220,"journal":{"name":"Politicka Ekonomie","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicka Ekonomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structural Funding and Disadvantage of Regions: Public and Non-Public Beneficiaries Considering the differences between public and non-public beneficiaries, the main aim of this paper is to evaluate the relationship between the disadvantage of Czech regions and the spatial distribution of EU structural funds in the programming period 2007–2013. The empirical results reveal negative and significant influence of socioeconomic disadvantage of regions on the amount of structural funds obtained by public beneficiaries. On the contrary, agglomeration economies are the statistically significant determinant of the amount of structural funds obtained by non-public beneficiaries. These conclusions are related to different absorption capacity of regions, regarding the number and size of projects. Overall, structural funds do not compensate for the disadvantage of regions, neither for public nor for non-public beneficiaries.
结构性资助与地区劣势:公共与非公共受益者
考虑到公共和非公共受益者之间的差异,本文的主要目的是评估2007-2013年规划期间捷克地区的劣势与欧盟结构基金的空间分布之间的关系。实证结果表明,地区社会经济劣势对公共受益者获得的结构性资金数量具有显著的负向影响。相反,集聚经济是非公共受益人获得结构性资金数量的统计显著决定因素。这些结论与不同地区的吸收能力、项目数量和规模有关。总体而言,结构性基金没有弥补地区的劣势,无论是对公共还是对非公共受益者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politicka Ekonomie
Politicka Ekonomie Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信