Winsorized Modified One Step M-Estimator As a Measure of the Central Tendency in the Alexander-Govern Test

ComTech Pub Date : 2016-09-30 DOI:10.21512/COMTECH.V7I3.2505
Tobi Kingsley Ochuko, Suhaida Abdullah, Zakiyah Zain, S. S. S. Yahaya
{"title":"Winsorized Modified One Step M-Estimator As a Measure of the Central Tendency in the Alexander-Govern Test","authors":"Tobi Kingsley Ochuko, Suhaida Abdullah, Zakiyah Zain, S. S. S. Yahaya","doi":"10.21512/COMTECH.V7I3.2505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research dealt with making comparison of the independent group tests with the use of parametric technique. This test used mean as its central tendency measure. It was a better alternative to the ANOVA, the Welch test and the James test, because it gave a good control of Type I error rates and high power with ease in its calculation, for variance heterogeneity under a normal data. But the test was found not to be robust to non-normal data. Trimmed mean was used on the test as its central tendency measure under non-normality for two group condition, but as the number of groups increased above two, the test failed to give a good control of Type I error rates. As a result of this, the MOM estimator was applied on the test as its central tendency measure and is not influenced by the number of groups. However, under extreme condition of skewness and kurtosis, the MOM estimator could no longer control the Type I error rates. In this study, the Winsorized MOM estimator was used in the AG test, as a measure of its central tendency under non-normality. 5,000 data sets were simulated and analysed for each of the test in the research design with the use of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) package. The results of the analysis shows that the Winsorized modified one step M-estimator in the Alexander-Govern (AGWMOM) test, gave the best control of Type I error rates under non-normality compared to the AG test, the AGMOM test, and the ANOVA, with the highest number of conditions for both lenient and stringent criteria of robustness.","PeriodicalId":31095,"journal":{"name":"ComTech","volume":"31 1","pages":"233-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ComTech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/COMTECH.V7I3.2505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research dealt with making comparison of the independent group tests with the use of parametric technique. This test used mean as its central tendency measure. It was a better alternative to the ANOVA, the Welch test and the James test, because it gave a good control of Type I error rates and high power with ease in its calculation, for variance heterogeneity under a normal data. But the test was found not to be robust to non-normal data. Trimmed mean was used on the test as its central tendency measure under non-normality for two group condition, but as the number of groups increased above two, the test failed to give a good control of Type I error rates. As a result of this, the MOM estimator was applied on the test as its central tendency measure and is not influenced by the number of groups. However, under extreme condition of skewness and kurtosis, the MOM estimator could no longer control the Type I error rates. In this study, the Winsorized MOM estimator was used in the AG test, as a measure of its central tendency under non-normality. 5,000 data sets were simulated and analysed for each of the test in the research design with the use of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) package. The results of the analysis shows that the Winsorized modified one step M-estimator in the Alexander-Govern (AGWMOM) test, gave the best control of Type I error rates under non-normality compared to the AG test, the AGMOM test, and the ANOVA, with the highest number of conditions for both lenient and stringent criteria of robustness.
在Alexander-Govern检验中,Winsorized改进的一步m估计量作为集中趋势的度量
本研究采用参数化技术对独立组检验进行比较。该检验使用均值作为集中趋势度量。它是ANOVA, Welch检验和James检验的更好替代,因为它很好地控制了I型错误率,并且易于计算,对于正常数据下的方差异质性。但发现该测试对非正态数据不可靠。在两组非正态性条件下,检验使用了修剪均值作为其集中趋势度量,但随着组数增加到两组以上,检验无法很好地控制I型错误率。因此,在测试中应用MOM估计量作为其集中趋势度量,并且不受组数的影响。然而,在偏度和峰度的极端条件下,MOM估计器不能再控制I型错误率。在本研究中,在AG检验中使用了Winsorized MOM估计器,作为其在非正态性下的集中趋势的度量。在研究设计中,使用统计分析软件(SAS)软件包对每个测试进行了5000个数据集的模拟和分析。分析结果表明,与AG检验、AGWMOM检验和ANOVA检验相比,Alexander-Govern (AGWMOM)检验中的Winsorized改进的一步m估计器在非正态性下对I型错误率的控制效果最好,具有最多的条件来满足宽松和严格的稳健性标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信