{"title":"Engaging First-Year Law Students Through Pro Bono Collaborations in Legal Writing","authors":"M. Bowman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1970024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article recommends developing assignments for first-year legal writing courses through collaborations with legal services organizations. The article stems from and describes such ongoing projects at Seattle University School of Law, where several hundred first-year law students have worked on such projects so far. We have partnered with lawyers at organizations like the National Employment Law Project, the ACLU of Washington, and Northwest Justice Project, to come up with live issues that they would like to have researched, and they received the best student work product from each class. The partner organizations have used the students’ work in several ways, including bringing successful impact litigation, preparing amicus briefs, and lobbying for legislative changes. These projects have increased our students’ understanding of the importance of legal research and writing, have motivated our students to improve their work product, and have helped the students gain a different perspective than they often see within the first-year curriculum. The article contextualizes these projects within the traditional legal writing curriculum and the Carnegie Report’s recommendations that law schools join lawyering professionalism and legal analysis from the beginning of law school. The article also draws on research into student engagement, including the Law School Survey of Student Engagement. The article discusses the literature regarding somewhat similar collaboration between legal writing and clinical faculty within the law school; these projects are complementary, but they have fewer timing challenges, are less resource-intensive for the law school, and they provide an opportunity to connect the law school with lawyers from community partner organizations. Finally, the article offers some concrete practical solutions to potential challenges in implementing these projects, including making sure that core legal writing objectives are met through the projects and how to teach the projects effectively to first-year students.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"62 1","pages":"586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1970024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article recommends developing assignments for first-year legal writing courses through collaborations with legal services organizations. The article stems from and describes such ongoing projects at Seattle University School of Law, where several hundred first-year law students have worked on such projects so far. We have partnered with lawyers at organizations like the National Employment Law Project, the ACLU of Washington, and Northwest Justice Project, to come up with live issues that they would like to have researched, and they received the best student work product from each class. The partner organizations have used the students’ work in several ways, including bringing successful impact litigation, preparing amicus briefs, and lobbying for legislative changes. These projects have increased our students’ understanding of the importance of legal research and writing, have motivated our students to improve their work product, and have helped the students gain a different perspective than they often see within the first-year curriculum. The article contextualizes these projects within the traditional legal writing curriculum and the Carnegie Report’s recommendations that law schools join lawyering professionalism and legal analysis from the beginning of law school. The article also draws on research into student engagement, including the Law School Survey of Student Engagement. The article discusses the literature regarding somewhat similar collaboration between legal writing and clinical faculty within the law school; these projects are complementary, but they have fewer timing challenges, are less resource-intensive for the law school, and they provide an opportunity to connect the law school with lawyers from community partner organizations. Finally, the article offers some concrete practical solutions to potential challenges in implementing these projects, including making sure that core legal writing objectives are met through the projects and how to teach the projects effectively to first-year students.
本文建议通过与法律服务机构合作,为第一年的法律写作课程开发作业。这篇文章源于并描述了西雅图大学法学院(Seattle University School of Law)正在进行的此类项目,到目前为止,该校已有数百名一年级法律系学生参与了此类项目。我们与国家就业法项目、华盛顿美国公民自由联盟和西北司法项目等组织的律师合作,提出他们想要研究的现实问题,他们从每个班级收到了最好的学生工作成果。合作组织以多种方式利用了学生们的工作,包括提出成功的影响诉讼,准备法庭之友简报,以及游说立法改革。这些项目增加了我们学生对法律研究和写作重要性的理解,激励我们的学生改进他们的工作成果,并帮助学生获得与他们在第一年课程中经常看到的不同的视角。本文将这些项目置于传统的法律写作课程和卡内基报告的建议中,即法学院从一开始就加入律师专业和法律分析。本文还借鉴了对学生参与的研究,包括法学院学生参与调查。本文讨论了有关法律写作与法学院临床教师之间类似合作的文献;这些项目是互补的,但它们的时间挑战更少,对法学院来说资源消耗更少,而且它们提供了一个将法学院与社区合作组织的律师联系起来的机会。最后,文章为实施这些项目的潜在挑战提供了一些具体可行的解决方案,包括确保通过项目实现核心法律写作目标,以及如何有效地向一年级学生教授这些项目。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.