On the Third Person Preformative l-/n-in Aramaic, and an Ethiopic Parallel

A. Rubin
{"title":"On the Third Person Preformative l-/n-in Aramaic, and an Ethiopic Parallel","authors":"A. Rubin","doi":"10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The origins of the third person preformatives I- and n- in the Eastern Aramaic dialects and in Biblical Aramaic have never been satisfactorily explained. In this paper, we will re-examine all of the evidence as we survey four centuries of previous attempts to tackle this issue. Though we will conclude that the current prevailing theory is in fact the correct one, we will demonstrate for the first time exactly why it is correct (and why other theories cannot be correct) and explain why this development took place in these dialects. We will also consider a similar development in Tigre in order to lend further support to our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The origins of the third person preformatives I- and n- in the Eastern Aramaic dialects and in Biblical Aramaic have never been satisfactorily explained. In this paper, we will re-examine all of the evidence as we survey four centuries of previous attempts to tackle this issue. Though we will conclude that the current prevailing theory is in fact the correct one, we will demonstrate for the first time exactly why it is correct (and why other theories cannot be correct) and explain why this development took place in these dialects. We will also consider a similar development in Tigre in order to lend further support to our conclusions.
论阿拉姆语中第三人称预述代词l-/n与埃塞俄比亚语的类似
在东部阿拉姆语方言和圣经阿拉姆语中,第三人称前置语I-和n-的起源从未得到令人满意的解释。在本文中,我们将重新审视所有的证据,因为我们调查了四个世纪以前解决这个问题的尝试。虽然我们将得出目前流行的理论实际上是正确的结论,但我们将首次确切地证明为什么它是正确的(以及为什么其他理论不可能是正确的),并解释为什么这种发展发生在这些方言中。我们还将考虑Tigre的类似发展,以便进一步支持我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信