Issue Preclusion Effect of Class Certification Orders

IF 0.7 4区社会学 Q2 LAW

Hastings Law Journal Pub Date : 2011-10-12 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1942774

Antonio Gidi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the peculiarities of issue preclusion in class action litigation, particularly after the approval of the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation in 2010 and the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Smith v. Bayer Corp. in the summer of 2011. After discussing the reasons why orders that deny class certification cannot have issue-preclusive effect, this paper analyses proposals to address the problem.

查看原文本刊更多论文

类别证明令的发布排除效应

本文论述了问题排除在集体诉讼中的特殊性，特别是在2010年美国法律协会的《集体诉讼法原则》和2011年夏天美国最高法院对史密斯诉拜耳公司一案的判决获得批准之后。本文在分析了驳回船级社认证的命令不能产生问题排除效果的原因后，分析了解决这一问题的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Hastings Law Journal LAW-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Hastings College of the Law was founded in 1878 as the first law department of the University of California, and today is one of the top-rated law schools in the United States. Its alumni span the globe and are among the most respected lawyers, judges and business leaders today. Hastings was founded in 1878 as the first law department of the University of California and is one of the most exciting and vibrant legal education centers in the nation. Our faculty are nationally renowned as both teachers and scholars.