The Corporate Gatekeeper in Ethical Perspective

Christopher Hines
{"title":"The Corporate Gatekeeper in Ethical Perspective","authors":"Christopher Hines","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1940007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fallout from the financial crisis continues to inform the development of corporate and securities law, and the new regulatory landscape for economic activity within the United States is beginning to take form. This evolutionary process, however, has been anything but stable or certain. As might be expected, in concert with such momentous change in law and policy, recriminations for and associated investigations of past activity continue to affect competent regulators as well as market participants. Nevertheless, while many of the underlying causes of the financial crisis are now better understood by both policy makers and scholars, the question remains – given where we were, where do we go from here? While a definitive answer to such a question remains elusive, an additional perspective on the ethical issues of relevance to corporate and securities law may be helpful in considering the possible alternatives. In particular, the ethical rules of corporate gatekeepers in conflicts of interest scenarios is worthy of further consideration and discussion.This article presents the argument that cases involving conflicts of interest in the corporate and securities law space may be viewed as primarily calling into question the ethical rules of the corporate gatekeeper. In support of such an argument, this article sets forth a framework for conflicts of interest scenarios that takes into account four categories of legal rules – activity rules, disclosure rules, liability rules and ethical rules. In adopting such a framework, an ethical perspective will be elaborated to address the ongoing development of corporate and securities law. Further, this article proposes possible revisions to disclosure rules in relation to conflicts of interest policies for Compensation Committees as mandated by Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.This article is the second in a series that explores the intersection of corporate law and legal ethics. Specifically, the present discussion concerns the foundations in doctrine and theory that may apply to issues of conflicts of interest within the ambit of corporate and securities law. Accordingly, the subject matter for discussion includes both rules of the professions – or first-order ethical rules – and rules as may be prescribed by the competent authority – that is, second-order ethical rules.","PeriodicalId":82026,"journal":{"name":"Missouri law review","volume":"78 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Missouri law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1940007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fallout from the financial crisis continues to inform the development of corporate and securities law, and the new regulatory landscape for economic activity within the United States is beginning to take form. This evolutionary process, however, has been anything but stable or certain. As might be expected, in concert with such momentous change in law and policy, recriminations for and associated investigations of past activity continue to affect competent regulators as well as market participants. Nevertheless, while many of the underlying causes of the financial crisis are now better understood by both policy makers and scholars, the question remains – given where we were, where do we go from here? While a definitive answer to such a question remains elusive, an additional perspective on the ethical issues of relevance to corporate and securities law may be helpful in considering the possible alternatives. In particular, the ethical rules of corporate gatekeepers in conflicts of interest scenarios is worthy of further consideration and discussion.This article presents the argument that cases involving conflicts of interest in the corporate and securities law space may be viewed as primarily calling into question the ethical rules of the corporate gatekeeper. In support of such an argument, this article sets forth a framework for conflicts of interest scenarios that takes into account four categories of legal rules – activity rules, disclosure rules, liability rules and ethical rules. In adopting such a framework, an ethical perspective will be elaborated to address the ongoing development of corporate and securities law. Further, this article proposes possible revisions to disclosure rules in relation to conflicts of interest policies for Compensation Committees as mandated by Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.This article is the second in a series that explores the intersection of corporate law and legal ethics. Specifically, the present discussion concerns the foundations in doctrine and theory that may apply to issues of conflicts of interest within the ambit of corporate and securities law. Accordingly, the subject matter for discussion includes both rules of the professions – or first-order ethical rules – and rules as may be prescribed by the competent authority – that is, second-order ethical rules.
道德视角下的企业看门人
金融危机的余波继续影响着公司法和证券法的发展,美国经济活动的新监管格局正开始形成。然而,这种进化过程既不稳定也不确定。正如可以预料的那样,在法律和政策发生如此重大变化的同时,对过去活动的指责和相关调查继续影响着主管监管机构和市场参与者。然而,尽管政策制定者和学者现在对金融危机的许多潜在原因有了更好的理解,但问题仍然存在——鉴于我们过去的处境,我们将何去何从?虽然对这一问题的明确答案仍然难以捉摸,但对与公司法和证券法相关的道德问题的额外观点可能有助于考虑可能的替代方案。特别是,在利益冲突的情况下,企业看门人的道德规则值得进一步思考和讨论。本文提出的论点是,在公司法和证券法领域涉及利益冲突的案件可能被视为主要是对公司看门人的道德规则提出质疑。为了支持这一论点,本文提出了一个利益冲突情景的框架,该框架考虑了四类法律规则——活动规则、披露规则、责任规则和道德规则。在采用这种框架时,将阐述道德观点,以解决公司法和证券法的持续发展问题。此外,本文还提出了对《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革与消费者保护法》第952条规定的薪酬委员会利益冲突政策披露规则的可能修订。本文是探讨公司法和法律伦理交集的系列文章中的第二篇。具体地说,目前的讨论涉及可能适用于公司法和证券法范围内的利益冲突问题的原则和理论基础。因此,讨论的主题既包括职业规则- -或一级道德规则- -也包括主管当局可能规定的规则- -即二级道德规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信