Reconstruction of upper extremity soft tissue defects with free flaps

Ersin Gür, Y. Tiftikcioglu
{"title":"Reconstruction of upper extremity soft tissue defects with free flaps","authors":"Ersin Gür, Y. Tiftikcioglu","doi":"10.19161/etd.1167445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Many methods have been described in the literature for the reconstruction of upper extremity defects that may occur as a result of various etiological reasons. Among these methods, local or regional flaps are used quite frequently, and most defects can be successfully reconstructed. However, in some large and complex defects, technically more difficult free flap options may be unavoidable. In our study, we present our experience on upper extremity reconstruction with free flaps. \n \nMaterials and Methods: Between 2015 and 2021, 9 patients (3 Female, 6 Male) underwent upper extremity reconstructions with free flaps. The ages of the patients ranged from 22 to 68 years. Our free flap choices included anterolateral thigh flap in 4 patients, latissimus dorsi free flap in 4 patients, and radial forearm free flap in 1 patient. Defects of patients were including dorsum of the hand in 3 patients, an amputation stump in 1 patient, the dorsum of the hand with the forearm in 2 patients, and the elbow with the forearm in 3 patients. \n \nResults: The radial artery was chosen as the recipient artery in all patients. The concomitant vein of the radial artery or the superficial venous system was used as the recipient vein. End-to-end anastomosis was performed in 6 patients and end-to-side anastomosis was performed in 3 patients. Arterial thrombosis was observed in 1 patient and venous thrombosis was observed in 1 patient. All vascular complications occurred in reconstructions with latissimus dorsi free flaps. Both patients were taken to early salvage surgery, the anastomoses were renewed and the flaps were salvaged. No additional complications were observed in other patients. There was no flap loss in our clinical series. \n \nConclusion: Free flaps can be used safely for upper extremity soft tissue reconstructions in appropriate cases. Although it requires technical experience, we believe that perforator-based free flaps are quite advantageous due to minimal donor site problems and can be safely chosen as the first method in suitable patients.","PeriodicalId":32499,"journal":{"name":"Ege Tip Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ege Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1167445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Many methods have been described in the literature for the reconstruction of upper extremity defects that may occur as a result of various etiological reasons. Among these methods, local or regional flaps are used quite frequently, and most defects can be successfully reconstructed. However, in some large and complex defects, technically more difficult free flap options may be unavoidable. In our study, we present our experience on upper extremity reconstruction with free flaps. Materials and Methods: Between 2015 and 2021, 9 patients (3 Female, 6 Male) underwent upper extremity reconstructions with free flaps. The ages of the patients ranged from 22 to 68 years. Our free flap choices included anterolateral thigh flap in 4 patients, latissimus dorsi free flap in 4 patients, and radial forearm free flap in 1 patient. Defects of patients were including dorsum of the hand in 3 patients, an amputation stump in 1 patient, the dorsum of the hand with the forearm in 2 patients, and the elbow with the forearm in 3 patients. Results: The radial artery was chosen as the recipient artery in all patients. The concomitant vein of the radial artery or the superficial venous system was used as the recipient vein. End-to-end anastomosis was performed in 6 patients and end-to-side anastomosis was performed in 3 patients. Arterial thrombosis was observed in 1 patient and venous thrombosis was observed in 1 patient. All vascular complications occurred in reconstructions with latissimus dorsi free flaps. Both patients were taken to early salvage surgery, the anastomoses were renewed and the flaps were salvaged. No additional complications were observed in other patients. There was no flap loss in our clinical series. Conclusion: Free flaps can be used safely for upper extremity soft tissue reconstructions in appropriate cases. Although it requires technical experience, we believe that perforator-based free flaps are quite advantageous due to minimal donor site problems and can be safely chosen as the first method in suitable patients.
游离皮瓣重建上肢软组织缺损
目的:文献中描述了多种方法用于上肢缺损的重建,这些缺损可能是由于各种病因造成的。在这些方法中,局部或区域皮瓣的使用频率很高,大多数缺损都能成功重建。然而,在一些大的和复杂的缺陷,技术上更困难的自由皮瓣的选择可能是不可避免的。在我们的研究中,我们介绍了用游离皮瓣重建上肢的经验。材料和方法:2015年至2021年间,9例患者(3例女性,6例男性)采用游离皮瓣进行上肢重建。患者年龄22 ~ 68岁。我们选择的自由皮瓣包括4例患者的大腿前外侧皮瓣,4例患者的背阔肌自由皮瓣,1例患者的前臂桡侧自由皮瓣。患者有3例手部背侧缺损,1例截肢残端缺损,2例手部背侧伴前臂缺损,3例肘部伴前臂缺损。结果:所有患者均选择桡动脉为受体动脉。取桡动脉伴静脉或浅静脉系统作为受体静脉。端端吻合6例,端侧吻合3例。动脉血栓形成1例,静脉血栓形成1例。所有血管并发症均发生在背阔肌游离皮瓣重建中。两例患者均行早期修复手术,修复吻合口,修复皮瓣。其他患者未见其他并发症。在我们的临床系列中没有皮瓣丢失。结论:游离皮瓣在适当情况下可安全用于上肢软组织重建。虽然需要技术经验,但我们相信基于穿支的游离皮瓣由于供体部位问题最小而具有相当的优势,并且可以安全地选择在合适的患者中作为第一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信