Is serum ferritin level or T2-sequence magnetic resonance imaging more effective in predicting liver iron in transfusion-dependent thalassemia cases?

F. Yildirim, Ayça Koca Yozgat, H. Tatlı Doğan, N. Turhan, H. Yaralı, Namık Yaşar Özbek
{"title":"Is serum ferritin level or T2-sequence magnetic resonance imaging more effective in predicting liver iron in transfusion-dependent thalassemia cases?","authors":"F. Yildirim, Ayça Koca Yozgat, H. Tatlı Doğan, N. Turhan, H. Yaralı, Namık Yaşar Özbek","doi":"10.19161/etd.1167238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Iron overload in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients is a condition that requires continuous chelation therapy and monitoring. Determination of serum ferritin level is considered a simple method to monitor body iron load; however, it highlights that other methods of liver iron level determination, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are more precise. \nMaterials and Methods: In order to contribute to understanding of liver iron load in thalassemia, liver iron level results of 14 transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients who underwent liver biopsy in preparation for stem cell transfusion were compared with liver T2 MRI and serum ferritin results. \nResults: The mean serum Ferritin value was 2488.43±1520.18 mg/L. When liver iron load was evaluated according to T2*MRI results, mild iron accumulation was found in eight patients, moderate level in five patients, and advanced iron accumulation in a patient. According to the modified Scheuer classification, iron level in biopsies was grade 1 in two patients; grade 2 in seven patients; It was grade 3 in three patients and grade 4 in two patients. As the ferritin level increased, the liver iron biopsy score also increased statistically significantly (r=0.544 and p=0.044). There was a statistically significant and inverse correlation between liver T2*MRI level and liver iron biopsy score (r=-0.724 and p=0.003). Ferritin level was not found statistically significant in differentiating iron level according to liver biopsy iron score (p=0.096). The area under the ROC curve for T2*MRI measurements was statistically significant (AUC=0.967; 95% CI: 0.880-1,000 and p=0.005). \nConclusıon: In our study, we found that serum ferritin and T2 MRI results were correlated with liver biopsy iron levels. However, we found that the sensitivity and specificity of ferritin level in liver biopsy to show iron level was low, and the sensitivity and specificity of T2 MRI was high.","PeriodicalId":32499,"journal":{"name":"Ege Tip Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ege Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1167238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Iron overload in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients is a condition that requires continuous chelation therapy and monitoring. Determination of serum ferritin level is considered a simple method to monitor body iron load; however, it highlights that other methods of liver iron level determination, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are more precise. Materials and Methods: In order to contribute to understanding of liver iron load in thalassemia, liver iron level results of 14 transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients who underwent liver biopsy in preparation for stem cell transfusion were compared with liver T2 MRI and serum ferritin results. Results: The mean serum Ferritin value was 2488.43±1520.18 mg/L. When liver iron load was evaluated according to T2*MRI results, mild iron accumulation was found in eight patients, moderate level in five patients, and advanced iron accumulation in a patient. According to the modified Scheuer classification, iron level in biopsies was grade 1 in two patients; grade 2 in seven patients; It was grade 3 in three patients and grade 4 in two patients. As the ferritin level increased, the liver iron biopsy score also increased statistically significantly (r=0.544 and p=0.044). There was a statistically significant and inverse correlation between liver T2*MRI level and liver iron biopsy score (r=-0.724 and p=0.003). Ferritin level was not found statistically significant in differentiating iron level according to liver biopsy iron score (p=0.096). The area under the ROC curve for T2*MRI measurements was statistically significant (AUC=0.967; 95% CI: 0.880-1,000 and p=0.005). Conclusıon: In our study, we found that serum ferritin and T2 MRI results were correlated with liver biopsy iron levels. However, we found that the sensitivity and specificity of ferritin level in liver biopsy to show iron level was low, and the sensitivity and specificity of T2 MRI was high.
血清铁蛋白水平或t2序列磁共振成像更有效地预测输血依赖性地中海贫血病例的肝铁?
目的:输血依赖性地中海贫血患者的铁超载是一种需要持续螯合治疗和监测的情况。测定血清铁蛋白水平被认为是监测机体铁负荷的一种简单方法;然而,它强调了其他肝铁水平测定方法,如磁共振成像(MRI),更精确。材料与方法:为了更好地了解地中海贫血患者的肝铁负荷,我们将14例输血依赖型地中海贫血患者的肝活检结果与肝脏T2 MRI和血清铁蛋白结果进行比较。结果:血清铁蛋白平均值为2488.43±1520.18 mg/L。当根据T2*MRI结果评估肝铁负荷时,8例患者发现轻度铁积累,5例患者发现中度铁积累,1例患者发现晚期铁积累。根据改良Scheuer分级,2例患者活检铁水平为1级;2级7例;3名患者为3级,2名患者为4级。随着铁蛋白水平的升高,肝铁活检评分也有统计学意义升高(r=0.544, p=0.044)。肝脏T2*MRI水平与肝铁活检评分呈显著负相关(r=-0.724, p=0.003)。铁蛋白水平与肝活检铁评分区分铁水平差异无统计学意义(p=0.096)。T2*MRI测量的ROC曲线下面积有统计学意义(AUC=0.967;95% CI: 0.880- 1000, p=0.005)。Conclusıon:在我们的研究中,我们发现血清铁蛋白和T2 MRI结果与肝活检铁水平相关。然而,我们发现肝活检中铁蛋白水平显示铁水平的敏感性和特异性较低,而T2 MRI的敏感性和特异性较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信