Modernization of the School Education System in the National Autonomies of the Middle Volga in the 1920s

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
E. Mineeva, A. Zykina, T. Ivanova
{"title":"Modernization of the School Education System in the National Autonomies of the Middle Volga in the 1920s","authors":"E. Mineeva, A. Zykina, T. Ivanova","doi":"10.21638/spbu24.2022.410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School education has traditionally been the most important area in the history of every nation and region. The official authorities often used the school to their advantage, to carry out certain policies and manage the territory. The aim of the work is to study the modernization processes in the field of school education, which were carried out in the autonomies of the Middle Volga region during the 1920s. In the comparative aspect, this problem has not been previously considered in Russian historiography. The study was carried out mainly on the basis of the analysis of diverse sources, especially archival materials. Using the example of such national autonomous entities as Mari El and Chuvashia, both general trends and distinctive features that existed during the formation of the new Soviet school system are shown. It can be argued that the educational policy of the 1920s was not fully sound, since the radical transformations of that time period led to extremely undesirable consequences. Among the positive results of the formation of a new school and the modernization policy in the field of education, we can name quantitative changes marked by an increase in the number of educational institutions, the number of teachers and the contingent of students. The policy of the educational program, proclaimed in the 1920s by the Soviet government, was also not brought to the end. The reasons for the failures were both objective (the consequences of the Civil War, famine, insufficient funding for education) and subjective (public dissatisfaction with certain measures in the field of school affairs, the refusal of individual teachers to cooperate with the new government, etc.) factors. As a result, in the early 1930s, the course of the Soviet government in relation to secondary schools was seriously revised.","PeriodicalId":53957,"journal":{"name":"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noveishaya Istoriya Rossii-Modern History of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu24.2022.410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School education has traditionally been the most important area in the history of every nation and region. The official authorities often used the school to their advantage, to carry out certain policies and manage the territory. The aim of the work is to study the modernization processes in the field of school education, which were carried out in the autonomies of the Middle Volga region during the 1920s. In the comparative aspect, this problem has not been previously considered in Russian historiography. The study was carried out mainly on the basis of the analysis of diverse sources, especially archival materials. Using the example of such national autonomous entities as Mari El and Chuvashia, both general trends and distinctive features that existed during the formation of the new Soviet school system are shown. It can be argued that the educational policy of the 1920s was not fully sound, since the radical transformations of that time period led to extremely undesirable consequences. Among the positive results of the formation of a new school and the modernization policy in the field of education, we can name quantitative changes marked by an increase in the number of educational institutions, the number of teachers and the contingent of students. The policy of the educational program, proclaimed in the 1920s by the Soviet government, was also not brought to the end. The reasons for the failures were both objective (the consequences of the Civil War, famine, insufficient funding for education) and subjective (public dissatisfaction with certain measures in the field of school affairs, the refusal of individual teachers to cooperate with the new government, etc.) factors. As a result, in the early 1930s, the course of the Soviet government in relation to secondary schools was seriously revised.
20世纪20年代中伏尔加民族自治地区学校教育制度的现代化
学校教育历来是每个民族和地区历史上最重要的领域。官方当局经常利用学校为自己的利益,执行某些政策和管理领土。这项工作的目的是研究学校教育领域的现代化进程,这是在20世纪20年代在伏尔加河中部地区的自治地区进行的。在比较方面,俄罗斯史学以前没有考虑过这个问题。本研究主要是在分析各种资料来源,特别是档案资料的基础上进行的。以Mari El和Chuvashia等民族自治实体为例,展示了新苏维埃学校制度形成过程中存在的总体趋势和独特特征。可以说,20世纪20年代的教育政策并不完全健全,因为那个时期的激进变革导致了极其不良的后果。在新学校的成立和教育领域的现代化政策的积极成果中,我们可以举出以教育机构数量、教师数量和学生队伍数量增加为标志的数量变化。苏联政府在20世纪20年代宣布的教育计划政策也没有结束。失败的原因既有客观因素(内战的后果、饥荒、教育经费不足),也有主观因素(公众对学校事务领域某些措施的不满、个别教师拒绝与新政府合作等)。因此,在20世纪30年代初,苏联政府对中学的态度进行了认真的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信