Coliphage as an Indicator of the Quality of Beach Water to Protect the Health of Swimmers in Coastal Georgia

Javier F. Gallard-Gongora, Kathryn McGowan Munck, Jeffery A. Jones, A. Aslan
{"title":"Coliphage as an Indicator of the Quality of Beach Water to Protect the Health of Swimmers in Coastal Georgia","authors":"Javier F. Gallard-Gongora, Kathryn McGowan Munck, Jeffery A. Jones, A. Aslan","doi":"10.21633/JGPHA.7.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastrointestinal disease affects millions of people in the United States and places a substantial economic burden upon healthcare systems. Recreational waters polluted with fecal material are a main source for transmission of gastrointestinal disease. Georgia beaches are monitored for the presence of fecal indicator bacteria, but these bacteria are not well associated with enteric viruses. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has recently proposed coliphage (a virus of Escherichia coli) as an alternative indicator of fecal contamination in recreational waters. The present study compares fecal indicator bacteria and coliphage concentrations at two Georgia beaches with adjacent creeks that have a history of pollution. Methods: For one year, samples and environmental data were collected from four sites on Jekyll Island, GA, during the peak swimming season and the off-season. Samples were processed using US EPA-approved methods for membrane filtration and plaque formation. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests and Spearman correlations. Results: The highest numbers of enterococci and significant differences with coliphage were found at Saint Andrews Creek during the swimming season and the off-season. The enterococci concentrations at Clam Creek sites did not exceed recommended recreational water criteria. During the off-season, concentrations of enterococci and coliphages were different at Clam Creek sites, indicating a potential risk for presence of enteric virus when enterococci could not be detected. Conclusions: The US EPA has proposed to adapt coliphage concentrations as an alternative indicator of water pollution for routine beach monitoring nationally. The present study provides a background for adoption of this method in Georgia. Measures of enterococci do not provide sufficient information about the associated human health risk. Inclusion of these viral indicators will improve decision making for beach closures and for protection of the health of swimmers.","PeriodicalId":73981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association","volume":"7 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21633/JGPHA.7.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal disease affects millions of people in the United States and places a substantial economic burden upon healthcare systems. Recreational waters polluted with fecal material are a main source for transmission of gastrointestinal disease. Georgia beaches are monitored for the presence of fecal indicator bacteria, but these bacteria are not well associated with enteric viruses. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) has recently proposed coliphage (a virus of Escherichia coli) as an alternative indicator of fecal contamination in recreational waters. The present study compares fecal indicator bacteria and coliphage concentrations at two Georgia beaches with adjacent creeks that have a history of pollution. Methods: For one year, samples and environmental data were collected from four sites on Jekyll Island, GA, during the peak swimming season and the off-season. Samples were processed using US EPA-approved methods for membrane filtration and plaque formation. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests and Spearman correlations. Results: The highest numbers of enterococci and significant differences with coliphage were found at Saint Andrews Creek during the swimming season and the off-season. The enterococci concentrations at Clam Creek sites did not exceed recommended recreational water criteria. During the off-season, concentrations of enterococci and coliphages were different at Clam Creek sites, indicating a potential risk for presence of enteric virus when enterococci could not be detected. Conclusions: The US EPA has proposed to adapt coliphage concentrations as an alternative indicator of water pollution for routine beach monitoring nationally. The present study provides a background for adoption of this method in Georgia. Measures of enterococci do not provide sufficient information about the associated human health risk. Inclusion of these viral indicators will improve decision making for beach closures and for protection of the health of swimmers.
噬菌体作为海滩水质量的一个指标,以保护佐治亚州沿海游泳者的健康
背景:胃肠道疾病影响着美国数百万人,并给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担。被粪便污染的游憩用水是胃肠道疾病传播的主要来源。对乔治亚州海滩的粪便指示细菌的存在进行了监测,但这些细菌与肠道病毒没有很好的联系。美国环境保护署(EPA)最近提议将噬菌体(大肠杆菌的一种病毒)作为娱乐用水中粪便污染的替代指标。目前的研究比较了乔治亚州两个海滩的粪便指示细菌和噬菌体浓度与附近有污染历史的小溪。方法:在一年多的时间里,在乔治亚州杰基尔岛的4个地点采集了游泳旺季和淡季的样本和环境数据。样品使用美国环保署批准的膜过滤和斑块形成方法进行处理。采用t检验和Spearman相关进行统计分析。结果:圣安德鲁斯溪游泳季和淡季肠球菌数量最高,与噬菌体数量差异显著。蛤溪各地点的肠球菌浓度没有超过建议的康乐用水标准。在淡季,Clam Creek站点的肠球菌和噬菌体浓度不同,表明在未检测到肠球菌的情况下存在肠道病毒的潜在风险。结论:美国环境保护署建议将噬菌体浓度作为全国常规海滩监测的水污染替代指标。本研究为格鲁吉亚采用这种方法提供了背景。肠球菌的测量不能提供有关人类健康风险的充分信息。纳入这些病毒指标将改善关闭海滩和保护游泳者健康的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信