«¿16 céntimos a cambio de aguas ácidas?». Respuestas políticas a la expansión minera en Cajamarca

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Mauricio Zavaleta
{"title":"«¿16 céntimos a cambio de aguas ácidas?». Respuestas políticas a la expansión minera en Cajamarca","authors":"Mauricio Zavaleta","doi":"10.18800/debatesensociologia.201702.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, Cajamarca has housed one of the most productive gold mines in the world. Between 1992, when the operations of the Yanacocha deposits began, until 2011, when the most important expansion project of the operating company was suspended, extractive activities have been a source of controversy. Only between 2004 and 2011 three conflicts reached national relevance in Cajamarca: Quilish (2004), Combayo (2006) and Minas Conga (2011). This continuum allows analyzing different types of «responses» —especially from rural areas— to mining. The article proposes that the peasant responses have been oriented to the negotiation of benefits that compensate the affectation of natural resources and allow the localities to accede, albeit in an indirect and limited way, to the profits produced by the industry. However, when the agreements reached with the company are not met or the population perceives that the impact on the means of subsistence is greater than the benefits received, incentives are generated for political mobilization. In this context, different coalitions had emerged between rural villages and urban organizations that, though ephemeral in organizational terms, promoted mobilizations against Yanacocha’s expansion projects with remarkable effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":53932,"journal":{"name":"Debates en Sociologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Debates en Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.201702.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, Cajamarca has housed one of the most productive gold mines in the world. Between 1992, when the operations of the Yanacocha deposits began, until 2011, when the most important expansion project of the operating company was suspended, extractive activities have been a source of controversy. Only between 2004 and 2011 three conflicts reached national relevance in Cajamarca: Quilish (2004), Combayo (2006) and Minas Conga (2011). This continuum allows analyzing different types of «responses» —especially from rural areas— to mining. The article proposes that the peasant responses have been oriented to the negotiation of benefits that compensate the affectation of natural resources and allow the localities to accede, albeit in an indirect and limited way, to the profits produced by the industry. However, when the agreements reached with the company are not met or the population perceives that the impact on the means of subsistence is greater than the benefits received, incentives are generated for political mobilization. In this context, different coalitions had emerged between rural villages and urban organizations that, though ephemeral in organizational terms, promoted mobilizations against Yanacocha’s expansion projects with remarkable effectiveness.
“16美分换酸性水?”对卡哈马卡矿业扩张的政策回应
几十年来,卡哈马卡拥有世界上产量最高的金矿之一。从1992年亚纳科查油田开始开采到2011年运营公司最重要的扩建项目暂停,开采活动一直是争议的来源。仅在2004年至2011年间,卡哈马卡就发生了三起具有全国性意义的冲突:奎利什(2004年)、康巴约(2006年)和米纳斯·康加(2011年)。这个连续体允许分析不同类型的“响应”-特别是来自农村地区-采矿。本文提出,农民的反应一直以利益谈判为导向,以补偿自然资源的影响,并允许地方以间接和有限的方式加入工业产生的利润。但是,如果与公司达成的协议没有得到履行,或者人民认为对生活资料的影响大于所获得的利益,就会产生鼓励,进行政治动员。在这种情况下,农村和城市组织之间出现了不同的联盟,尽管在组织方面是短暂的,但却以显著的效果推动了反对亚纳科查扩建项目的动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信