Turn on the Living Law: The Construction and Implications of Living Law in Ratification of Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP)

Rechtsidee Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.21070/jihr.v11i0.798
Musmuliady, Jubair, Aminuddin Kasim
{"title":"Turn on the Living Law: The Construction and Implications of Living Law in Ratification of Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP)","authors":"Musmuliady, Jubair, Aminuddin Kasim","doi":"10.21070/jihr.v11i0.798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal provisions that live in society are one of the controversial provisions in the ratification of the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP). That is because the law in the community is related to legal values written and unwritten in society. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of culture in RKUHP. This research is normative legal research that puts forward legal issues on the implications of legal arrangements regarding living law in the RKUHP and focuses on using a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the construction of living law in the community (living law) in the RKUHP, which emphasizes that the living law is customary law, is also formulated simultaneously with the regional role in establishing regional regulations based on the substance of local customary law. In addition, the construction of regional rules to accommodate Article 2 of the RKUHP to regulate the importance of customary law raises legal ambiguity, namely regional rules at the provincial or regency/city level that have the authority to regulate them; so that there is no disharmony of customary law arrangements in the formulation of regional regulations as a follow-up to Article 2 RKUHP. Furthermore, the legal implications related to living law arrangements in the RKUHP, namely the lack of clarity in Article 2 of the RKUHP, including the need for regulation at the regional level through regional regulations, have the potential to cause criminalization based on regional principles","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v11i0.798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal provisions that live in society are one of the controversial provisions in the ratification of the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP). That is because the law in the community is related to legal values written and unwritten in society. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of culture in RKUHP. This research is normative legal research that puts forward legal issues on the implications of legal arrangements regarding living law in the RKUHP and focuses on using a conceptual and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the construction of living law in the community (living law) in the RKUHP, which emphasizes that the living law is customary law, is also formulated simultaneously with the regional role in establishing regional regulations based on the substance of local customary law. In addition, the construction of regional rules to accommodate Article 2 of the RKUHP to regulate the importance of customary law raises legal ambiguity, namely regional rules at the provincial or regency/city level that have the authority to regulate them; so that there is no disharmony of customary law arrangements in the formulation of regional regulations as a follow-up to Article 2 RKUHP. Furthermore, the legal implications related to living law arrangements in the RKUHP, namely the lack of clarity in Article 2 of the RKUHP, including the need for regulation at the regional level through regional regulations, have the potential to cause criminalization based on regional principles
开启活法:刑法草案批准书中活法的建构与意蕴
存在于社会中的法律条款是刑法草案批准过程中存在争议的条款之一。这是因为社会中的法律与社会中成文和不成文的法律价值有关。本研究旨在分析香港大学协和分校文化的法律层面。这项研究是规范性的法律研究,提出了在皇家皇家大学法学院有关现行法律的法律安排的影响的法律问题,并侧重于使用概念和成文法的方法。研究结果证实,RKUHP强调“活法”为习惯法的社区活法建构(活法),也是与以地方习惯法实质为基础,建立区域法规的区域角色同步制定的。此外,为了适应RKUHP第2条规定习惯法的重要性而构建的地区规则引发了法律歧义,即省级或县/市一级的地区规则有权对其进行规范;使习惯法安排不致在制定区域法规时出现不协调的情况,作为第2条的后续行动。此外,与《区域合作方案》中现行法律安排有关的法律问题,即《区域合作方案》第2条缺乏明确性,包括需要通过区域条例在区域一级进行管制,有可能导致根据区域原则定罪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信