Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using enzalutamide for treatment of patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
N. Avxentyev, M. Frolov, Y. Makarova
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using enzalutamide for treatment of patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer","authors":"N. Avxentyev, M. Frolov, Y. Makarova","doi":"10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-2-82-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases among men. Until recently, the most common treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in Russia was to continue previously started hormonal therapy. Enzalutamide is a second-generation anti-androgen indicated for treatment of CRPC, regardless of a patient’s metastatic status, which significantly increases metastasis-free survival in nmCRPC compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Objective: to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of enzalutamide use in patients with nmCRPC and the ICER of abiraterone as the first-line therapy for mCRPC from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Standard ADT regimens for nmCRPC were used as a comparator as it was the only approved treatment for nmCRPC in Russia. We proposed a Markov model of CRPC progression on enzalutamide plus ADT (hereinafter enzalutamide) or ADT based on PROSPER trial data. Model was used to calculate progression-free life years and costs of nmCRPC and post-progression CRPC treatment. Simulation period was 5 years with one cycle of 1 month. In the “cost–effectiveness” analysis, we calculated enzalutamide ICER compared to ADT. In addition, we calculated ICER for abiraterone plus ADT and prednisolone (hereinafter abiraterone) vs ADT + prednisolone in the first-line therapy of metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) as a benchmark. In both cases, time to disease progression over a 5-year period was used as an efficacy criteria.Results. According to the Markov model, progression-free life-years gained for enzalutamide were 3.12 years compared to 1.79 for ADT within a 5-year period. The average enzalutamide therapy costs were 7,989,475.8 rubles/1 patient for 5 years, which were 5,716,983.5 rubles higher than when using ADT (2,272,492.3 rubles). ICER for enzalutamide (vs ADT) was 4,307,136.3 rubles per one progression-free life-year gained. ICER for abiraterone in the first line of mCRPC treatment (vs ADT + prednisolone) was 6,191,617.4 rubles per one progression-free life-year gained.Conclusion. In the Russian healthcare system, ICER for enzalutamide in nmCRPC was 4,307,136.3 rubles and the ICER for abiraterone in mCRPC was 6,191,617.4 rubles. ","PeriodicalId":42924,"journal":{"name":"Onkourologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkourologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-2-82-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases among men. Until recently, the most common treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in Russia was to continue previously started hormonal therapy. Enzalutamide is a second-generation anti-androgen indicated for treatment of CRPC, regardless of a patient’s metastatic status, which significantly increases metastasis-free survival in nmCRPC compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Objective: to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of enzalutamide use in patients with nmCRPC and the ICER of abiraterone as the first-line therapy for mCRPC from the Russian healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods. Standard ADT regimens for nmCRPC were used as a comparator as it was the only approved treatment for nmCRPC in Russia. We proposed a Markov model of CRPC progression on enzalutamide plus ADT (hereinafter enzalutamide) or ADT based on PROSPER trial data. Model was used to calculate progression-free life years and costs of nmCRPC and post-progression CRPC treatment. Simulation period was 5 years with one cycle of 1 month. In the “cost–effectiveness” analysis, we calculated enzalutamide ICER compared to ADT. In addition, we calculated ICER for abiraterone plus ADT and prednisolone (hereinafter abiraterone) vs ADT + prednisolone in the first-line therapy of metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) as a benchmark. In both cases, time to disease progression over a 5-year period was used as an efficacy criteria.Results. According to the Markov model, progression-free life-years gained for enzalutamide were 3.12 years compared to 1.79 for ADT within a 5-year period. The average enzalutamide therapy costs were 7,989,475.8 rubles/1 patient for 5 years, which were 5,716,983.5 rubles higher than when using ADT (2,272,492.3 rubles). ICER for enzalutamide (vs ADT) was 4,307,136.3 rubles per one progression-free life-year gained. ICER for abiraterone in the first line of mCRPC treatment (vs ADT + prednisolone) was 6,191,617.4 rubles per one progression-free life-year gained.Conclusion. In the Russian healthcare system, ICER for enzalutamide in nmCRPC was 4,307,136.3 rubles and the ICER for abiraterone in mCRPC was 6,191,617.4 rubles. 
使用恩杂鲁胺治疗非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的药物经济学方面
背景。前列腺癌是男性最常见的恶性疾病之一。直到最近,俄罗斯非转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(nmCRPC)最常见的治疗方法是继续先前开始的激素治疗。Enzalutamide是用于治疗CRPC的第二代抗雄激素,无论患者的转移状态如何,与雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)相比,Enzalutamide显著提高了nmCRPC的无转移生存期。目的:从俄罗斯医疗系统的角度评价恩杂鲁胺在nmCRPC患者中应用的增量成本-效果比(ICER)和阿比特龙作为mCRPC一线治疗的增量成本-效果比(ICER)。材料和方法。nmCRPC的标准ADT方案被用作比较,因为它是俄罗斯唯一批准的nmCRPC治疗方案。基于PROSPER试验数据,我们提出了恩杂鲁胺加ADT(以下简称恩杂鲁胺)或ADT治疗CRPC进展的马尔可夫模型。使用模型计算nmCRPC和进展后CRPC治疗的无进展寿命年和费用。模拟周期为5年,1个月为一个周期。在“成本-效果”分析中,我们计算了恩杂鲁胺与ADT的ICER。此外,我们计算了阿比特龙联合ADT和泼尼松龙(以下简称阿比特龙)与ADT +泼尼松龙在转移性CRPC (mCRPC)一线治疗中的ICER作为基准。在这两种情况下,疾病进展时间在5年期间被用作疗效标准。根据Markov模型,在5年期间内,enzalutamide获得的无进展生命年为3.12年,而ADT为1.79年。5年内,恩杂鲁胺的平均治疗费用为每名患者7,989,475.8卢布,比使用ADT(2,272,492.3卢布)高出5,716,983.5卢布。恩杂鲁胺(与ADT相比)的ICER为每增加一个无进展生命年4,307,136.3卢布。在mCRPC治疗的第一线,阿比特龙的ICER(与ADT +强的松龙相比)为每获得一个无进展生命年6191,617.4卢布。在俄罗斯医疗保健系统中,恩杂鲁胺在nmCRPC中的ICER为4,307,136.3卢布,阿比特龙在mCRPC中的ICER为6,191,617.4卢布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Onkourologiya
Onkourologiya ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal "Cancer urology" is publishing up-to-date information about scientific clinical researches, diagnostics, treatment of oncologic urological diseases. The aim of the edition is to inform the experts on oncologic urology about achievements in this area, to build understanding of the necessary integrated interdisciplinary approach in therapy, alongside with urologists, combining efforts of doctors of various specialties (cardiologists, pediatricians, chemotherapeutists et al.), to contribute to raising the effectiveness of oncologic patients’ treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信