Evaluation of beneficiation options for recovery of ultrafine thermal coal

Q2 Materials Science
M. Menéndez, M. Gent, P. Riesgo, A. Suárez
{"title":"Evaluation of beneficiation options for recovery of ultrafine thermal coal","authors":"M. Menéndez, M. Gent, P. Riesgo, A. Suárez","doi":"10.19150/MMP.6747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent requirements to reduce thermal coal plant emissions, and ultrafine coal’s tendency to produce these emissions due to its typically high ash and moisture contents have limited the use of ultrafine coal. Ultrafine coal in beneficiation plants are usually either disposed of in tailing ponds at a loss in combustible material or disposed of by blending with coarser higher-grade products, resulting in a reduction in marketed product quality. A study of the options for processing ultrafine coal, consisting of < 200 μm hydrocyclone overflow, with 38.8 percent ash content is presented here. Ultrafine coal was processed based on 200-μm sieve bend and 10-μm hydrocyclone classifications, enhanced gravity separation (EGS) and froth flotation concentration as well as combinations of these. Yield, combustible material recovery (CMR) and product humidity were evaluated as test results.Depending on the processing applied, product ash content could be reduced up to 49.7 percent, and up to 95.8 percent CMR of the actual run of mill feed could be attained. All of the processing options analyzed could reduce produced thermal electric plant emissions due to ash and moisture from 22 to 38 percent of the actual unprocessed ultrafine coal product.Froth flotation was found to be the optimal process, yielding a product with the lowest ash content attained of 19.5 percent and CMR of 92.3 percent. Being the most versatile of the processes evaluated, it is capable of producing coal with varied ash contents but is subject to potential variations in coal flotability. The most complicated of the processing options, a combined sieve bend recovery of the > 200 μm fraction and EGS processing of the 10 to 200 μm fraction was found to be the next best option, attaining a combined 90.1 percent CMR and 25.0 percent ash content.","PeriodicalId":18536,"journal":{"name":"Minerals & Metallurgical Processing","volume":"33 1","pages":"116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.19150/MMP.6747","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals & Metallurgical Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19150/MMP.6747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent requirements to reduce thermal coal plant emissions, and ultrafine coal’s tendency to produce these emissions due to its typically high ash and moisture contents have limited the use of ultrafine coal. Ultrafine coal in beneficiation plants are usually either disposed of in tailing ponds at a loss in combustible material or disposed of by blending with coarser higher-grade products, resulting in a reduction in marketed product quality. A study of the options for processing ultrafine coal, consisting of < 200 μm hydrocyclone overflow, with 38.8 percent ash content is presented here. Ultrafine coal was processed based on 200-μm sieve bend and 10-μm hydrocyclone classifications, enhanced gravity separation (EGS) and froth flotation concentration as well as combinations of these. Yield, combustible material recovery (CMR) and product humidity were evaluated as test results.Depending on the processing applied, product ash content could be reduced up to 49.7 percent, and up to 95.8 percent CMR of the actual run of mill feed could be attained. All of the processing options analyzed could reduce produced thermal electric plant emissions due to ash and moisture from 22 to 38 percent of the actual unprocessed ultrafine coal product.Froth flotation was found to be the optimal process, yielding a product with the lowest ash content attained of 19.5 percent and CMR of 92.3 percent. Being the most versatile of the processes evaluated, it is capable of producing coal with varied ash contents but is subject to potential variations in coal flotability. The most complicated of the processing options, a combined sieve bend recovery of the > 200 μm fraction and EGS processing of the 10 to 200 μm fraction was found to be the next best option, attaining a combined 90.1 percent CMR and 25.0 percent ash content.
超细动力煤回收选矿方案评价
最近减少动力煤电厂排放的要求,以及超细煤由于其典型的高灰分和高水分含量而产生这些排放的趋势,限制了超细煤的使用。在选矿厂,超细煤通常要么以可燃物质的形式损失在尾矿库中处理,要么与较粗的高品位产品混合处理,导致产品质量下降。对< 200 μm水旋流溢流、灰分38.8%的超细煤的处理方案进行了研究。采用200 μm筛弯和10 μm水力旋流器分级、强化重选和泡沫浮选选矿及其组合工艺对超细煤进行了选矿试验。收率、可燃材料回收率(CMR)和产品湿度作为测试结果进行了评价。根据所采用的处理方法,产品灰分含量可降低49.7%,可达到实际磨料运行的95.8% CMR。所分析的所有处理方案都可以将热电厂生产的由灰和水分引起的排放量从实际未加工的超细煤产品的22%减少到38%。泡沫浮选是最佳工艺,产品灰分最低,为19.5%,CMR为92.3%。作为所评价的最通用的工艺,它能够生产不同灰分含量的煤,但受煤可浮性的潜在变化的影响。在最复杂的处理方案中,> 200 μm馏分的联合筛弯回收和10 ~ 200 μm馏分的EGS处理被认为是次优选择,CMR为90.1%,灰分含量为25.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerals & Metallurgical Processing
Minerals & Metallurgical Processing 工程技术-矿业与矿物加工
CiteScore
0.84
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over twenty-five years, M&MP has been your source for the newest thinking in the processing of minerals and metals. We cover the latest developments in a wide range of applicable disciplines, from metallurgy to computer science to environmental engineering. Our authors, experts from industry, academia and the government, present state-of-the-art research from around the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信