How Useful is it to Understand Belfast as a Global City

P. Rea
{"title":"How Useful is it to Understand Belfast as a Global City","authors":"P. Rea","doi":"10.21427/D7SM76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The globalisation paradigm has emerged within contemporary social thought as the preferred framework of many urban theorists. This essay discusses the relative usefulness of understanding Belfast as a ‘global’ city and argues that the dominance of ‘Troubles talk’ and discourses of ‘neutral’ space and post-Good Friday Agreement stability have often been explored at the expense of such an understanding. Focusing on a few select examples, most notably the ambitious ‘Titanic Quarter’ development in the city’s docklands, the essay attempts to reposition Belfast within a wider global context by examining how a globalised economy, culture and polity are manifest in the city. In doing so however, it is acknowledged that a wholly global theory cannot hope to fully consider the complex nature of urban life. By drawing attention to those investigating the local and every-day, the essay concludes that a single theoretical lens can offer only a partial understanding. Future research regarding Belfast, it is suggested, should also remain mindful of the seemingly mundane ‘practices’ of the city and the subjective experience of individuals, in order to offer the most comprehensive and nuanced understanding possible.","PeriodicalId":30337,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21427/D7SM76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The globalisation paradigm has emerged within contemporary social thought as the preferred framework of many urban theorists. This essay discusses the relative usefulness of understanding Belfast as a ‘global’ city and argues that the dominance of ‘Troubles talk’ and discourses of ‘neutral’ space and post-Good Friday Agreement stability have often been explored at the expense of such an understanding. Focusing on a few select examples, most notably the ambitious ‘Titanic Quarter’ development in the city’s docklands, the essay attempts to reposition Belfast within a wider global context by examining how a globalised economy, culture and polity are manifest in the city. In doing so however, it is acknowledged that a wholly global theory cannot hope to fully consider the complex nature of urban life. By drawing attention to those investigating the local and every-day, the essay concludes that a single theoretical lens can offer only a partial understanding. Future research regarding Belfast, it is suggested, should also remain mindful of the seemingly mundane ‘practices’ of the city and the subjective experience of individuals, in order to offer the most comprehensive and nuanced understanding possible.
将贝尔法斯特理解为一个全球城市有多有用
全球化范式在当代社会思想中作为许多城市理论家的首选框架出现。本文讨论了将贝尔法斯特理解为一个“全球”城市的相对有用性,并认为“麻烦谈话”和“中立”空间的话语以及后耶稣受难日协议稳定的主导地位往往是以牺牲这种理解为代价的。专注于几个选定的例子,最值得注意的是在城市的港口区雄心勃勃的“泰坦尼克区”的发展,本文试图通过研究全球化的经济,文化和政治是如何在城市中体现贝尔法斯特在更广泛的全球背景下重新定位。然而,在这样做的过程中,人们认识到,一个完全全球性的理论不能指望充分考虑到城市生活的复杂性。通过关注那些调查当地和日常生活的人,文章得出结论,单一的理论镜头只能提供部分理解。有人建议,未来关于贝尔法斯特的研究也应该注意城市中看似平凡的“实践”和个人的主观体验,以便提供最全面和细致入微的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信