Social Misfits or Victims of Exclusion? Contradictory Representations of Irish Travellers in the Irish Press

Zeynep Cihan Koca-Helvaci
{"title":"Social Misfits or Victims of Exclusion? Contradictory Representations of Irish Travellers in the Irish Press","authors":"Zeynep Cihan Koca-Helvaci","doi":"10.21427/D7P13W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most significant current discussions in discourse studies is the media representation of socially disadvantaged groups (KhosraviNik, 2009; Baker et al., 2008; van Dijk, 1991). The aim of this study is to examine the Irish media’s attitude towards Irish Travellers who have been pushed to the fringes of society with allegations that their nomadic lifestyle is incompatible with industrialised Irish society (Moore, 2012; van Hout, 2011; McVeigh, 1997). The dataset for this paper is comprised of newspaper texts from The Irish Times, The Irish Independent and The Irish Daily Mail printed between January 2012 and September 2014. Data were gathered through the Nexis UK database. Because the newspaper corpora vary greatly in size, the analysis was carried out in two stages. First, corpus software AntConc 3.4.3 (Anthony, 2014) was used to obtain high frequency words in the whole corpus to gain an insight into the discourse topics associated with Travellers. Second, journalistic commentaries from three newspapers on the 2014 Oireachtas report were taken into consideration for the analysis of APPRAISAL resources which show evaluative stance of the writers through ATTITUDE, ENGAGEMENT and GRADUATION categories (Martin and White, 2005). Legitimation strategies which were used to justify evaluative stance were also investigated in this stage. The quantitative analysis shows the dominance of ATTITUDE categories in all corpora. The liberal Irish Times positively appraised Travellers and the Oireachtas Report, and justified their support for ethnic recognition through a moral evaluation of previous discrimination policies. The politically right-centre Independent and Daily Mail had rather negative attitudes, and they legitimized their opposition through moral evaluation and rationalization grounded upon the stereotypical images associated with Travellers.","PeriodicalId":30337,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21427/D7P13W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

One of the most significant current discussions in discourse studies is the media representation of socially disadvantaged groups (KhosraviNik, 2009; Baker et al., 2008; van Dijk, 1991). The aim of this study is to examine the Irish media’s attitude towards Irish Travellers who have been pushed to the fringes of society with allegations that their nomadic lifestyle is incompatible with industrialised Irish society (Moore, 2012; van Hout, 2011; McVeigh, 1997). The dataset for this paper is comprised of newspaper texts from The Irish Times, The Irish Independent and The Irish Daily Mail printed between January 2012 and September 2014. Data were gathered through the Nexis UK database. Because the newspaper corpora vary greatly in size, the analysis was carried out in two stages. First, corpus software AntConc 3.4.3 (Anthony, 2014) was used to obtain high frequency words in the whole corpus to gain an insight into the discourse topics associated with Travellers. Second, journalistic commentaries from three newspapers on the 2014 Oireachtas report were taken into consideration for the analysis of APPRAISAL resources which show evaluative stance of the writers through ATTITUDE, ENGAGEMENT and GRADUATION categories (Martin and White, 2005). Legitimation strategies which were used to justify evaluative stance were also investigated in this stage. The quantitative analysis shows the dominance of ATTITUDE categories in all corpora. The liberal Irish Times positively appraised Travellers and the Oireachtas Report, and justified their support for ethnic recognition through a moral evaluation of previous discrimination policies. The politically right-centre Independent and Daily Mail had rather negative attitudes, and they legitimized their opposition through moral evaluation and rationalization grounded upon the stereotypical images associated with Travellers.
与社会格格不入还是被排斥的受害者?爱尔兰新闻界对爱尔兰旅行者的矛盾描述
当前话语研究中最重要的讨论之一是社会弱势群体的媒体表征(KhosraviNik, 2009;Baker et al., 2008;van Dijk, 1991)。本研究的目的是研究爱尔兰媒体对爱尔兰旅行者的态度,他们被推到了社会的边缘,指控他们的游牧生活方式与工业化的爱尔兰社会不相容(摩尔,2012;van Hout, 2011;麦克维,1997)。本文的数据集包括2012年1月至2014年9月期间出版的《爱尔兰时报》、《爱尔兰独立报》和《爱尔兰每日邮报》的报纸文本。数据是通过英国Nexis数据库收集的。由于报纸语料库的大小差异很大,所以分析分两个阶段进行。首先,使用语料库软件AntConc 3.4.3 (Anthony, 2014)获取整个语料库中的高频词,以深入了解与旅行者相关的话语主题。其次,三家报纸对2014年Oireachtas报告的新闻评论被纳入评估资源的分析,评估资源通过态度、参与和毕业类别显示了作者的评估立场(Martin and White, 2005)。在这一阶段,还研究了用于评价立场正当化的正当化策略。定量分析表明,态度类在所有语料库中都占主导地位。自由主义的《爱尔兰时报》积极评价了《旅行者》和《奥伊雷achtas报告》,并通过对以往歧视政策的道德评价证明了他们支持种族承认的合理性。政治上偏右的《独立报》和《每日邮报》持相当消极的态度,他们通过道德评价和基于与旅行者有关的刻板形象的合理化来使他们的反对合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信