Error-Centricity, Habeas Corpus and the Rule of Law as the Law of Rulings

Q4 Social Sciences
R. Berkowitz
{"title":"Error-Centricity, Habeas Corpus and the Rule of Law as the Law of Rulings","authors":"R. Berkowitz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.466381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article begins with an historical observation, that until recently error was not considered a problem in criminal law. Today, however, an elaborate system of appellate courts and extraordinary means of post-conviction relief have been adopted to root out error from legal verdicts. This article asks what law's relatively newfound concern with error reveals about the changing nature of truth and justice in modern society. By asking how error comes to be understood within habeas corpus jurisprudence, the article explores the modern legal understanding of truth and justice as objectivity and fairness.","PeriodicalId":39678,"journal":{"name":"Louisiana Law Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louisiana Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.466381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article begins with an historical observation, that until recently error was not considered a problem in criminal law. Today, however, an elaborate system of appellate courts and extraordinary means of post-conviction relief have been adopted to root out error from legal verdicts. This article asks what law's relatively newfound concern with error reveals about the changing nature of truth and justice in modern society. By asking how error comes to be understood within habeas corpus jurisprudence, the article explores the modern legal understanding of truth and justice as objectivity and fairness.
错误中心性、人身保护令与法治
本文从一个历史观察开始,直到最近,错误才被认为是刑法中的一个问题。然而,今天,一套复杂的上诉法院制度和定罪后救济的特别手段已被采用,以根除法律判决中的错误。这篇文章探讨了在现代社会中,法律对错误的新关注揭示了真理和正义本质的变化。本文通过探究人身保护令法学中错误是如何被理解的问题,探讨了现代法律对客观与公平的真理与正义的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Louisiana Law Review
Louisiana Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Louisiana Law Review went into print in November of 1938. Since then the Review has served as Louisiana"s flagship legal journal and has become a vibrant forum for scholarship in comparative and civil law topics. The article below is taken from the first issue of the Law Review. The piece was meant to commemorate the founding of the Law Review and to foreshadow the lasting impact that the Louisiana Law Review would have on state jurisprudence and legislation and on the legal landscape of Louisiana for years to come.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信