{"title":"Hacia Arts & Architecture La revolución editorial de John Entenza (1938-1945)","authors":"D. Díez Martínez","doi":"10.20868/cn.2018.3813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumen En enero de 1945 Arts & Architecture puso en marcha el programa CaseStudy House, un experimento ideado por John Entenza que les reservaríaa él y a su revista un lugar importante en la historia de la arquitectura moderna del siglo XX. Desde que asumió la dirección de Arts & Architectureen 1940, Entenza supo rodearse de creadores y artistas como Alvin Lustig,Ray y Charles Eames, Herbert Matter o Julius Shulman, que contribuyerona elevar el estándar gráfico de su publicación y le confirieron una identidadinnovadora que respaldaba visualmente el discurso intelectual vanguardista de compromiso con la arquitectura y el diseño modernos que defendía en sus páginas. Este artículo analiza los orígenes, las estrategias de trasformación y los nombres propios que hicieron realidad una revista que, cincuenta años después de su desaparición en 1967, sigue resultando tan atractiva y radical como cuando se editaba.AbstractIn January 1945 Arts & Architecture launched the Case Study House program, an experiment devised by John Entenza that would reserve for him and his magazine an important place in the history of modern architecture of the twentieth century. From the moment he took over the direction of Arts & Architecture in 1940, Entenza knew how to seduce creators and artists such as Alvin Lustig, Ray and Charles Eames, Herbert Matter and Julius Shulman, who contributed to raise the graphic standard of his publication and gave it an innovative identity that visually supported the avant-garde intellectual discourse of commitment to modern architecture and design that it defended in its pages. This article analyzesthe origins, the strategies of transformation and the proper names that made the magazine a reality that, fifty years after its disappearance in 1967, continues to be as attractive and radical as when it was published.","PeriodicalId":40549,"journal":{"name":"Cuaderno de Notas","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaderno de Notas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20868/cn.2018.3813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resumen En enero de 1945 Arts & Architecture puso en marcha el programa CaseStudy House, un experimento ideado por John Entenza que les reservaríaa él y a su revista un lugar importante en la historia de la arquitectura moderna del siglo XX. Desde que asumió la dirección de Arts & Architectureen 1940, Entenza supo rodearse de creadores y artistas como Alvin Lustig,Ray y Charles Eames, Herbert Matter o Julius Shulman, que contribuyerona elevar el estándar gráfico de su publicación y le confirieron una identidadinnovadora que respaldaba visualmente el discurso intelectual vanguardista de compromiso con la arquitectura y el diseño modernos que defendía en sus páginas. Este artículo analiza los orígenes, las estrategias de trasformación y los nombres propios que hicieron realidad una revista que, cincuenta años después de su desaparición en 1967, sigue resultando tan atractiva y radical como cuando se editaba.AbstractIn January 1945 Arts & Architecture launched the Case Study House program, an experiment devised by John Entenza that would reserve for him and his magazine an important place in the history of modern architecture of the twentieth century. From the moment he took over the direction of Arts & Architecture in 1940, Entenza knew how to seduce creators and artists such as Alvin Lustig, Ray and Charles Eames, Herbert Matter and Julius Shulman, who contributed to raise the graphic standard of his publication and gave it an innovative identity that visually supported the avant-garde intellectual discourse of commitment to modern architecture and design that it defended in its pages. This article analyzesthe origins, the strategies of transformation and the proper names that made the magazine a reality that, fifty years after its disappearance in 1967, continues to be as attractive and radical as when it was published.
在这一背景下,本文提出了一种新的方法,以确定在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初发生了哪些变化,以及在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初发生了哪些变化。自担任条地址& 1940 Architectureen创作者和表演者,Entenza不知道在野艾尔文Lustig,射线和Charles Eames,赫伯特事项或朱利叶斯Shulman contribuyerona提高标准他的出版和赋予一个图形可视化identidadinnovadora一派为了知识演讲?我们致力于现代架构和设计是在其网站上。这篇文章分析了一份杂志的起源、转型策略和名字,使它成为现实,在1967年消失50年后,它仍然像编辑时一样有吸引力和激进。1945年1月,艺术与建筑公司推出了一个案例研究项目,由John Entenza设计的一个实验,为他和他的杂志在20世纪现代建筑史上保留了一个重要的位置。From the巴拉克已经把over the direction of 1940条& Architecture in, Entenza * how to引诱creators艾尔文Lustig和艺术家,如射线和Charles Eames,赫伯特-朱利叶斯Shulman, contributed to the graphic标准提高其出版物和给了it an innovative identity visually承诺支持the avant-garde intellectual discourse of to modern Architecture and design that it上in its pages。这篇文章分析了起源、转变策略和适当的名称,使该杂志成为现实,在1967年消失50年后,仍然像它出版时一样有吸引力和激进。