Notary as a Subject of Formation of Postmodern Society of Civil Legal Type

Nataliya Manoylo
{"title":"Notary as a Subject of Formation of Postmodern Society of Civil Legal Type","authors":"Nataliya Manoylo","doi":"10.18662/po/13.4/531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the notary as a subject of active influence on the formation of postmodern democratic legal society, mediation of law in postmodern society. The constitutional definition of the state in this status does not mean that the civil law consciousness prevails in all spheres of its life. Since no person in society does not need this type of legal service, it is quite objective to consider this community as a subject whose activities should be considered as a subject of formation not only of legal consciousness of society but also a leading subject of civil society. This primarily applies to private notaries, who, unlike public notaries, are fully responsible for the results of their activities. After all, a legal duty is organically combined with the responsibility from which the public notary is released. The study of the manifestations of the phenomenon of postmodernism is relevant to many disciplines, including - the philosophy of law. Modern research shows that classical types of legal understanding do not satisfy the understanding of postmodern law, which indicates the need to find a fundamentally new concept of law. The author concludes that the solution to this problem should be sought in the field of theories that offer new approaches to the interpretation of legal texts; this area is considered the most promising.","PeriodicalId":44010,"journal":{"name":"Postmodern Openings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postmodern Openings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article considers the notary as a subject of active influence on the formation of postmodern democratic legal society, mediation of law in postmodern society. The constitutional definition of the state in this status does not mean that the civil law consciousness prevails in all spheres of its life. Since no person in society does not need this type of legal service, it is quite objective to consider this community as a subject whose activities should be considered as a subject of formation not only of legal consciousness of society but also a leading subject of civil society. This primarily applies to private notaries, who, unlike public notaries, are fully responsible for the results of their activities. After all, a legal duty is organically combined with the responsibility from which the public notary is released. The study of the manifestations of the phenomenon of postmodernism is relevant to many disciplines, including - the philosophy of law. Modern research shows that classical types of legal understanding do not satisfy the understanding of postmodern law, which indicates the need to find a fundamentally new concept of law. The author concludes that the solution to this problem should be sought in the field of theories that offer new approaches to the interpretation of legal texts; this area is considered the most promising.
公证作为后现代民事法型社会形成的主体
本文认为,公证员作为一种主体,对后现代民主法制社会的形成、后现代社会的法律调解产生了积极的影响。宪法对处于这种状态的国家的定义并不意味着民法意识在其生活的所有领域都占上风。既然社会上没有人不需要这种类型的法律服务,那么将这个社区视为一个主体是非常客观的,它的活动不仅应该被视为社会法律意识的形成主体,而且应该被视为公民社会的主导主体。这主要适用于私人公证员,他们与公证员不同,对其活动的结果负有全部责任。毕竟,公证员的法律义务与公证员的责任是有机结合在一起的。对后现代主义现象表现形式的研究涉及许多学科,包括法哲学。现代研究表明,经典的法律理解类型不能满足对后现代法律的理解,这表明需要寻找一种从根本上新的法律概念。作者的结论是,解决这一问题的办法应该在为法律文本解释提供新途径的理论领域中寻求;这个领域被认为是最有前途的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postmodern Openings
Postmodern Openings SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信