The Evidence-based Periodontal Risk Assessment (PRA) Tool for Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy in a Comprehensive Periodontal Management by Risk Assessment (PEMBRA)

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
M. Masud, Izza Ilyani Mohd Ishak, Najihah Kamarazaman, I. H. Baharuddin
{"title":"The Evidence-based Periodontal Risk Assessment (PRA) Tool for Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy in a Comprehensive Periodontal Management by Risk Assessment (PEMBRA)","authors":"M. Masud, Izza Ilyani Mohd Ishak, Najihah Kamarazaman, I. H. Baharuddin","doi":"10.21315/aos2022.17s1.oa06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the management of periodontitis patients, periodontal risk assessment (PRA) tool is currently being applied during periodontal review (PR). However, an assessment of risk profiles during examination and diagnosis (E&D) may and would effectively assess and diagnose patients’ periodontal conditions, provide personalised treatment planning, and render an enhanced patient care through periodontal management by risk assessment (PEMBRA). From a retrospective study on selected records of 81 patients treated for chronic periodontitis, the PRA profiles of the patients were evaluated during E&D and two to three months after completion of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) during PR. The results were analysed using SPSS version 24 for descriptive statistics. On E&D, the patients presented with 25.9% localised and 74.1% generalised chronic periodontitis. Of these, 2.5% of low-risk patients on E&D increased to 21% during PR signifying an improvement after the treatment. However, the medium-risk patients have a slight increase from 32% to 35%, and patients with a high risk of 62% were reduced to 43%. The improvement of the risk profiles for both low and high-risk groups was mostly contributed by the reduction in the plaque score, percentages of bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm. This evidence-based evaluation of PRA tool during E&D and PR is important for PEMBRA as it encouraged the clinicians to adopt periodontal management through basic periodontal examination, detailed periodontal charting, radiographic interpretation, tooth per tooth prognosis, diagnosis, and targeted NSPT.","PeriodicalId":44961,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orofacial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/aos2022.17s1.oa06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the management of periodontitis patients, periodontal risk assessment (PRA) tool is currently being applied during periodontal review (PR). However, an assessment of risk profiles during examination and diagnosis (E&D) may and would effectively assess and diagnose patients’ periodontal conditions, provide personalised treatment planning, and render an enhanced patient care through periodontal management by risk assessment (PEMBRA). From a retrospective study on selected records of 81 patients treated for chronic periodontitis, the PRA profiles of the patients were evaluated during E&D and two to three months after completion of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) during PR. The results were analysed using SPSS version 24 for descriptive statistics. On E&D, the patients presented with 25.9% localised and 74.1% generalised chronic periodontitis. Of these, 2.5% of low-risk patients on E&D increased to 21% during PR signifying an improvement after the treatment. However, the medium-risk patients have a slight increase from 32% to 35%, and patients with a high risk of 62% were reduced to 43%. The improvement of the risk profiles for both low and high-risk groups was mostly contributed by the reduction in the plaque score, percentages of bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm. This evidence-based evaluation of PRA tool during E&D and PR is important for PEMBRA as it encouraged the clinicians to adopt periodontal management through basic periodontal examination, detailed periodontal charting, radiographic interpretation, tooth per tooth prognosis, diagnosis, and targeted NSPT.
基于证据的牙周风险评估(PRA)工具在综合牙周风险评估管理(PEMBRA)中的非手术牙周治疗
在牙周炎患者的管理中,牙周风险评估(PRA)工具目前正在牙周检查(PR)中应用。然而,在检查和诊断(E&D)期间对风险概况进行评估可以并且将有效地评估和诊断患者的牙周状况,提供个性化的治疗计划,并通过风险评估牙周管理(PEMBRA)提供增强的患者护理。回顾性研究了81例慢性牙周炎患者的治疗记录,评估了患者在E&D期间和PR期间完成非手术牙周治疗(NSPT)后2至3个月的PRA谱。使用SPSS 24版本对结果进行描述性统计分析。在E&D中,25.9%的患者表现为局部慢性牙周炎,74.1%为全身性慢性牙周炎。其中,2.5%接受E&D治疗的低风险患者在PR期间增加到21%,表明治疗后有所改善。然而,中等风险患者从32%略微增加到35%,高风险62%的患者减少到43%。低风险组和高风险组的风险概况的改善主要得益于斑块评分、探针出血百分比(BOP)和探针袋深度(PPD)≥5 mm的降低。在E&D和PR期间对PRA工具进行循证评估对PEMBRA非常重要,因为它鼓励临床医生通过基本的牙周检查、详细的牙周图表、x线片解释、每颗牙齿的预后、诊断和有针对性的NSPT来进行牙周管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Orofacial Science
Archives of Orofacial Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
27
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信