Ethics in community nursing

B. Pope, M. Hough, S. Chase
{"title":"Ethics in community nursing","authors":"B. Pope, M. Hough, S. Chase","doi":"10.18785/OJHE.1202.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this theoretical paper is to explore the ethics in community nursing. Nursing, a practice discipline recognizes caring, morals, and values as integral to the practice of all nurses. The ethical principles of beneficence, autonomy, advocacy, and social justice will be discussed from the lens of caring. Caring nursing theorists, such as Jean Watson, Ann Boykin, and Savina Schoenhofer, articulate the importance of understanding communities and individuals as whole and autonomous. These theorists and others challenge nursing to engage in a responsive, ethical and philosophical discourse when the community is viewed as autonomous. Ethics in Community Nursing Bonnie PopeUniversity of North Florida; M.C. Hough – University of North Florida; & Susan Chase – University of Central Florida The nursing profession encompasses a philosophical foundation of caring, ethics, morals, and values (Gadow, 2004). Theorists have examined the principles of nursing, caring, and ethics to a philosophical foundation that recognizes individuals as whole and autonomous (Boykin & Schoenhofer, 2001; Newman, Smith, Pharris & Jones, 2008; Watson, 1990). The challenge to nursing is to engage in a responsive, ethical and philosophical discourse when the community is also understood to be whole and autonomous. The purpose of this theoretical paper is to explore ethics in community practice with the principles of caring, beneficence, autonomy, advocacy, and social justice. The Tradition of Nursing Ethics The ability of our health system to deliver consistent quality health care continues to be debated on a national level, and nursing’s moral obligation is not only to be a part of the debate (Watson, 1990) but also to advocate for communities, not as statistical populations, but as individuals deserving quality health care. It is imperative for the profession to clearly articulate an ethical perspective grounded in responsive relationships with individuals and communities. These relationships require a respect for diversity and the right of self-determination (Austin, 2007; Bouchet, 2007; Chase, 2004; Glaser, Soskin & Smith, 1996; Tarlier, 2004). Current existentialist ethics value the inherent uniqueness of individuals and groups that require nurses to practice beyond a disconnected view of individual autonomy (Gadow, 2004). In order to achieve this level of practice, nursing must expand the scope of current ethical principles, beneficence, autonomy, and advocacy (Benner, Tanner, & Chesla, 1996; Chase, 2004; Cody, 2003; Gadow, 1990, 1990; Shirley, 2007; Tarlier, 2004). Nursing’s engagement in early bioethical debates incorporated discussions on patient autonomy in health care decision-making (Shirley, 2007). Paternalistic practices that limit an individual’s right of self-determination have been and still are being challenged by nursing. Gadow’s concept of existential advocacy clarifies the role of nursing in circumstances that defends a patient’s authentic free will to self-determination. According to Gadow (1990), only the patient can determine the truth in any situation. As patients and nursing professionals emphasize the significance of patient autonomy, paternalistic health care practices require an informed examination of the ethical concepts beneficence and autonomy (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). The principle of beneficence requires one to “do good” and refrain from harmful acts, “do no harm” or nonmaleficence. Nursing recognizes autonomy and selfdetermination as corner stones in nurse – patient relationships (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013; King, 1999). A nursing practice grounded in ethics and caring can transform health care practices (Newman, 2008). Nurses’ Commitment to Care: The Individual, Family, and Community Nursing and general nursing theories are primarily focused on the nurse -patient relationship in an acute care or ambulatory care setting. However, health care policy, which directly and indirectly impacts the nurse patient relationship, is crafted in the public arena. It is in the realm of the public arena and community settings that nurses recognize the potential to influence acute care or ambulatory settings. To shift between an individual patient focus and a comprehensive community focus challenges traditional ethical and moral concepts of beneficence, autonomy, advocacy, and social justice. Beneficence A fundamental principle of beneficence in traditional health care settings is to “maximize benefit and minimize harm to patients” (Gadow, 1990, pg. 52). This implies that it is the health care professional who is best able to identify potential harm and benefit. However, from a caring and ethical point of view, nurses understand the difference between acts of paternalistic beneficence and the essential knowledge that patients are part of any decision. In nursing ethics beneficence is a moral obligation seen as worthy and noble. And, nurses need to go further and understand that acts of beneficence may not always be in the patient’s best interest (Tarlier, 2004). Throughout clinical decision-making situations, novice and expert nurses have an obligation to remain mindful of the patient’s right to autonomy, even if the nurse considers their nursing care as beneficial to patient outcomes (Benner, et al., 1996; Chase, 2004). However, when nurses are required to make decisions that by necessity negate patient choices, these decisions should be considered as beneficence (Chase, 2004). Nurses must not only treat persons autonomously and refrain from causing harm, but they should also be aware of the overall welfare of individuals and communities. Public health programs related to childhood immunizations and vaccinations demonstrate beneficence on a community level. These programs weigh the harm and benefit of immunizations and vaccinations and recognize that harm may be done to few but the majority of the people will benefit (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). With an individual and community framework, the obligation of nursing grounded in ethics and caring realizes the effect of current situations to guide inform future acts of beneficence.","PeriodicalId":89828,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of health ethics","volume":"12 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of health ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18785/OJHE.1202.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this theoretical paper is to explore the ethics in community nursing. Nursing, a practice discipline recognizes caring, morals, and values as integral to the practice of all nurses. The ethical principles of beneficence, autonomy, advocacy, and social justice will be discussed from the lens of caring. Caring nursing theorists, such as Jean Watson, Ann Boykin, and Savina Schoenhofer, articulate the importance of understanding communities and individuals as whole and autonomous. These theorists and others challenge nursing to engage in a responsive, ethical and philosophical discourse when the community is viewed as autonomous. Ethics in Community Nursing Bonnie PopeUniversity of North Florida; M.C. Hough – University of North Florida; & Susan Chase – University of Central Florida The nursing profession encompasses a philosophical foundation of caring, ethics, morals, and values (Gadow, 2004). Theorists have examined the principles of nursing, caring, and ethics to a philosophical foundation that recognizes individuals as whole and autonomous (Boykin & Schoenhofer, 2001; Newman, Smith, Pharris & Jones, 2008; Watson, 1990). The challenge to nursing is to engage in a responsive, ethical and philosophical discourse when the community is also understood to be whole and autonomous. The purpose of this theoretical paper is to explore ethics in community practice with the principles of caring, beneficence, autonomy, advocacy, and social justice. The Tradition of Nursing Ethics The ability of our health system to deliver consistent quality health care continues to be debated on a national level, and nursing’s moral obligation is not only to be a part of the debate (Watson, 1990) but also to advocate for communities, not as statistical populations, but as individuals deserving quality health care. It is imperative for the profession to clearly articulate an ethical perspective grounded in responsive relationships with individuals and communities. These relationships require a respect for diversity and the right of self-determination (Austin, 2007; Bouchet, 2007; Chase, 2004; Glaser, Soskin & Smith, 1996; Tarlier, 2004). Current existentialist ethics value the inherent uniqueness of individuals and groups that require nurses to practice beyond a disconnected view of individual autonomy (Gadow, 2004). In order to achieve this level of practice, nursing must expand the scope of current ethical principles, beneficence, autonomy, and advocacy (Benner, Tanner, & Chesla, 1996; Chase, 2004; Cody, 2003; Gadow, 1990, 1990; Shirley, 2007; Tarlier, 2004). Nursing’s engagement in early bioethical debates incorporated discussions on patient autonomy in health care decision-making (Shirley, 2007). Paternalistic practices that limit an individual’s right of self-determination have been and still are being challenged by nursing. Gadow’s concept of existential advocacy clarifies the role of nursing in circumstances that defends a patient’s authentic free will to self-determination. According to Gadow (1990), only the patient can determine the truth in any situation. As patients and nursing professionals emphasize the significance of patient autonomy, paternalistic health care practices require an informed examination of the ethical concepts beneficence and autonomy (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). The principle of beneficence requires one to “do good” and refrain from harmful acts, “do no harm” or nonmaleficence. Nursing recognizes autonomy and selfdetermination as corner stones in nurse – patient relationships (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013; King, 1999). A nursing practice grounded in ethics and caring can transform health care practices (Newman, 2008). Nurses’ Commitment to Care: The Individual, Family, and Community Nursing and general nursing theories are primarily focused on the nurse -patient relationship in an acute care or ambulatory care setting. However, health care policy, which directly and indirectly impacts the nurse patient relationship, is crafted in the public arena. It is in the realm of the public arena and community settings that nurses recognize the potential to influence acute care or ambulatory settings. To shift between an individual patient focus and a comprehensive community focus challenges traditional ethical and moral concepts of beneficence, autonomy, advocacy, and social justice. Beneficence A fundamental principle of beneficence in traditional health care settings is to “maximize benefit and minimize harm to patients” (Gadow, 1990, pg. 52). This implies that it is the health care professional who is best able to identify potential harm and benefit. However, from a caring and ethical point of view, nurses understand the difference between acts of paternalistic beneficence and the essential knowledge that patients are part of any decision. In nursing ethics beneficence is a moral obligation seen as worthy and noble. And, nurses need to go further and understand that acts of beneficence may not always be in the patient’s best interest (Tarlier, 2004). Throughout clinical decision-making situations, novice and expert nurses have an obligation to remain mindful of the patient’s right to autonomy, even if the nurse considers their nursing care as beneficial to patient outcomes (Benner, et al., 1996; Chase, 2004). However, when nurses are required to make decisions that by necessity negate patient choices, these decisions should be considered as beneficence (Chase, 2004). Nurses must not only treat persons autonomously and refrain from causing harm, but they should also be aware of the overall welfare of individuals and communities. Public health programs related to childhood immunizations and vaccinations demonstrate beneficence on a community level. These programs weigh the harm and benefit of immunizations and vaccinations and recognize that harm may be done to few but the majority of the people will benefit (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013). With an individual and community framework, the obligation of nursing grounded in ethics and caring realizes the effect of current situations to guide inform future acts of beneficence.
社区护理伦理
本文旨在探讨社区护理的伦理问题。护理,一门实践学科承认关怀,道德和价值观是所有护士实践的组成部分。慈善、自主、倡导和社会正义的伦理原则将从关怀的角度进行讨论。关怀护理理论家,如Jean Watson, Ann Boykin和Savina Schoenhofer,阐明了将社区和个人视为整体和自主的重要性。当社区被视为自治时,这些理论家和其他人挑战护理参与响应,道德和哲学话语。社区护理伦理学;北佛罗里达大学;M.C. Hough -北佛罗里达大学;护理职业包含了关怀、伦理、道德和价值观的哲学基础(Gadow, 2004)。理论家们已经将护理、关怀和伦理原则研究到了一个哲学基础上,即承认个人是整体和自主的(Boykin & Schoenhofer, 2001;纽曼,史密斯,法瑞斯和琼斯,2008;华生,1990)。护理面临的挑战是在社区也被理解为整体和自主的情况下,参与响应,道德和哲学话语。这篇理论论文的目的是探讨在关怀、慈善、自治、倡导和社会正义的原则下,社区实践中的伦理。在全国范围内,我们的卫生系统是否有能力提供始终如一的高质量的卫生保健一直备受争议,护理的道德义务不仅是辩论的一部分(Watson, 1990),而且还应倡导社区,而不是作为统计人口,而是作为个人,应该得到高质量的卫生保健。对于专业人士来说,在与个人和社区建立响应关系的基础上,清晰地表达道德观点是必不可少的。这些关系需要尊重多样性和自决权(Austin, 2007;Bouchet, 2007;追逐,2004;格拉泽,索斯金&史密斯,1996;Tarlier, 2004)。当前的存在主义伦理重视个人和群体的内在独特性,这要求护士超越个人自主性的孤立观点(Gadow, 2004)。为了达到这一水平的实践,护理必须扩大当前伦理原则、慈善、自治和倡导的范围(Benner, Tanner, & Chesla, 1996;追逐,2004;科迪,2003;Gadow, 1990,1990;雪莉,2007;Tarlier, 2004)。在早期的生物伦理辩论中,护理人员参与了关于患者在医疗保健决策中的自主权的讨论(雪莉,2007)。限制个人自决权利的家长式做法已经并且仍然受到护理的挑战。Gadow的存在主义倡导概念阐明了护理在维护病人真正的自主自由意志的情况下的作用。Gadow(1990)认为,在任何情况下,只有患者才能决定真相。由于患者和护理专业人员强调患者自主的重要性,家长式的医疗保健实践需要对慈善和自主的伦理概念进行知情检查(Beauchamp & Childress, 2013)。善行的原则要求一个人“行善”,避免有害的行为,“不伤害”或无恶意。护理认识到自主和自决是护患关系的基石(Beauchamp & Childress, 2013;王,1999)。以道德和关怀为基础的护理实践可以改变医疗保健实践(纽曼,2008)。护士对护理的承诺:个人、家庭和社区护理和一般护理理论主要关注急性护理或门诊护理环境中的护患关系。然而,直接或间接影响护患关系的医疗保健政策是在公共领域制定的。在公共场所和社区环境中,护士认识到影响急性护理或门诊环境的潜力。在以个体患者为中心和以综合社区为中心之间的转变挑战了传统的慈善、自主、倡导和社会正义的伦理和道德观念。在传统的卫生保健环境中,慈善的一个基本原则是“对病人的利益最大化和伤害最小化”(Gadow, 1990,第52页)。这意味着卫生保健专业人员最有能力确定潜在的危害和益处。然而,从关怀和道德的角度来看,护士理解家长式的慈善行为与病人是任何决定的一部分的基本知识之间的区别。在护理伦理学中,善行是一种道德义务,被认为是有价值和高尚的。 本文旨在探讨社区护理的伦理问题。护理,一门实践学科承认关怀,道德和价值观是所有护士实践的组成部分。慈善、自主、倡导和社会正义的伦理原则将从关怀的角度进行讨论。关怀护理理论家,如Jean Watson, Ann Boykin和Savina Schoenhofer,阐明了将社区和个人视为整体和自主的重要性。当社区被视为自治时,这些理论家和其他人挑战护理参与响应,道德和哲学话语。社区护理伦理学;北佛罗里达大学;M.C. Hough -北佛罗里达大学;护理职业包含了关怀、伦理、道德和价值观的哲学基础(Gadow, 2004)。理论家们已经将护理、关怀和伦理原则研究到了一个哲学基础上,即承认个人是整体和自主的(Boykin & Schoenhofer, 2001;纽曼,史密斯,法瑞斯和琼斯,2008;华生,1990)。护理面临的挑战是在社区也被理解为整体和自主的情况下,参与响应,道德和哲学话语。这篇理论论文的目的是探讨在关怀、慈善、自治、倡导和社会正义的原则下,社区实践中的伦理。在全国范围内,我们的卫生系统是否有能力提供始终如一的高质量的卫生保健一直备受争议,护理的道德义务不仅是辩论的一部分(Watson, 1990),而且还应倡导社区,而不是作为统计人口,而是作为个人,应该得到高质量的卫生保健。对于专业人士来说,在与个人和社区建立响应关系的基础上,清晰地表达道德观点是必不可少的。这些关系需要尊重多样性和自决权(Austin, 2007;Bouchet, 2007;追逐,2004;格拉泽,索斯金&史密斯,1996;Tarlier, 2004)。当前的存在主义伦理重视个人和群体的内在独特性,这要求护士超越个人自主性的孤立观点(Gadow, 2004)。为了达到这一水平的实践,护理必须扩大当前伦理原则、慈善、自治和倡导的范围(Benner, Tanner, & Chesla, 1996;追逐,2004;科迪,2003;Gadow, 1990,1990;雪莉,2007;Tarlier, 2004)。在早期的生物伦理辩论中,护理人员参与了关于患者在医疗保健决策中的自主权的讨论(雪莉,2007)。限制个人自决权利的家长式做法已经并且仍然受到护理的挑战。Gadow的存在主义倡导概念阐明了护理在维护病人真正的自主自由意志的情况下的作用。Gadow(1990)认为,在任何情况下,只有患者才能决定真相。由于患者和护理专业人员强调患者自主的重要性,家长式的医疗保健实践需要对慈善和自主的伦理概念进行知情检查(Beauchamp & Childress, 2013)。善行的原则要求一个人“行善”,避免有害的行为,“不伤害”或无恶意。护理认识到自主和自决是护患关系的基石(Beauchamp & Childress, 2013;王,1999)。以道德和关怀为基础的护理实践可以改变医疗保健实践(纽曼,2008)。护士对护理的承诺:个人、家庭和社区护理和一般护理理论主要关注急性护理或门诊护理环境中的护患关系。然而,直接或间接影响护患关系的医疗保健政策是在公共领域制定的。在公共场所和社区环境中,护士认识到影响急性护理或门诊环境的潜力。在以个体患者为中心和以综合社区为中心之间的转变挑战了传统的慈善、自主、倡导和社会正义的伦理和道德观念。在传统的卫生保健环境中,慈善的一个基本原则是“对病人的利益最大化和伤害最小化”(Gadow, 1990,第52页)。这意味着卫生保健专业人员最有能力确定潜在的危害和益处。然而,从关怀和道德的角度来看,护士理解家长式的慈善行为与病人是任何决定的一部分的基本知识之间的区别。在护理伦理学中,善行是一种道德义务,被认为是有价值和高尚的。 而且,护士需要进一步了解,慈善行为可能并不总是符合患者的最佳利益(Tarlier, 2004)。在整个临床决策过程中,新手和专家护士都有义务时刻关注患者的自主权,即使护士认为他们的护理有利于患者的预后(Benner等,1996;追逐,2004)。然而,当护士被要求做出决定,必须否定病人的选择,这些决定应被视为善行(Chase, 2004)。护士不仅必须自主治疗病人,避免造成伤害,而且还应该意识到个人和社区的整体福利。与儿童免疫和疫苗接种相关的公共卫生项目在社区层面上显示了益处。这些项目权衡了免疫接种和疫苗接种的利弊,并认识到伤害可能只会对少数人造成伤害,但大多数人会受益(Beauchamp & Childress, 2013)。在个人和社区的框架下,以道德和关怀为基础的护理义务实现了当前情况对指导未来慈善行为的影响。 而且,护士需要进一步了解,慈善行为可能并不总是符合患者的最佳利益(Tarlier, 2004)。在整个临床决策过程中,新手和专家护士都有义务时刻关注患者的自主权,即使护士认为他们的护理有利于患者的预后(Benner等,1996;追逐,2004)。然而,当护士被要求做出决定,必须否定病人的选择,这些决定应被视为善行(Chase, 2004)。护士不仅必须自主治疗病人,避免造成伤害,而且还应该意识到个人和社区的整体福利。与儿童免疫和疫苗接种相关的公共卫生项目在社区层面上显示了益处。这些项目权衡了免疫接种和疫苗接种的利弊,并认识到伤害可能只会对少数人造成伤害,但大多数人会受益(Beauchamp & Childress, 2013)。在个人和社区的框架下,以道德和关怀为基础的护理义务实现了当前情况对指导未来慈善行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书