{"title":"The number of stocks in your portfolio should be larger than you think: diversification evidence from five developed markets","authors":"Alexeev, F. Tapon","doi":"10.21314/JOIS.2015.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study of five developed markets, we analyze the sizes of portfolios required \nto achieve the most diversification benefits. We compute several widely accepted \nmeasures of risk and use an extreme risk measure to account for black swan \nevents. In addition to providing portfolio size recommendations for an average \ninvestor, we estimate confidence bands around central measures of risk and offer \nrecommendations for attaining the most diversification benefits 90% of the time, \ninstead of on average. In contrast to previous literature that suggests between \n10 and 15 stocks are enough to provide adequate diversification for an average \ninvestor, we find that in fact more than 73 stocks are needed to achieve the same \nlevel of diversification most of the time, instead of on average.","PeriodicalId":90597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interaction science","volume":"4 1","pages":"43-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interaction science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOIS.2015.037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
In this study of five developed markets, we analyze the sizes of portfolios required
to achieve the most diversification benefits. We compute several widely accepted
measures of risk and use an extreme risk measure to account for black swan
events. In addition to providing portfolio size recommendations for an average
investor, we estimate confidence bands around central measures of risk and offer
recommendations for attaining the most diversification benefits 90% of the time,
instead of on average. In contrast to previous literature that suggests between
10 and 15 stocks are enough to provide adequate diversification for an average
investor, we find that in fact more than 73 stocks are needed to achieve the same
level of diversification most of the time, instead of on average.