How is Pelagic Sargassum-Associated Biodiversity Assessed? Insights from the Literature

IF 1.5 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Kristie S. T. Alleyne
{"title":"How is Pelagic Sargassum-Associated Biodiversity Assessed? Insights from the Literature","authors":"Kristie S. T. Alleyne","doi":"10.18785/gcr.3301.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade unprecedented blooming of pelagic Sargassum has occurred across the Equatorial Atlantic from West Africa to the Caribbean. Although pelagic Sargassum mats are considered beneficial in the open ocean, providing valuable habitat for a diverse array of endemic and associated species, they also inundate coastal areas and cause a plethora of management challenges for fisheries, tourism, nearshore coastal ecosystems, public health and the socioeconomic welfare of coastal communities. In—water harvesting has been suggested as a desirable management solution to prevent shoreline inundation, but destruction of the associated biodiversity is a concern with this approach and has not been adequately examined. Furthermore, in—water harvesting methods within the Tropical Atlantic and Caribbean have been ad hoc and highly variable with no established sampling protocol. Here we review 30 published studies detailing methods to collect information on the biodiversity associated with pelagic Sargassum. Nets, hook and line, video recordings, bare—hands and plastic bags have all been used to collect epiphytic, clinging and free—swimming fauna associated with Sargassum. Net sampling was the predominant method; however, in the absence of a standardized approach a wide range of net types and sizes were used. Similarly, separation, identification and preservation methods were all unstandardized. This review highlights the need for standardization and provides the first set of guidelines for the collection and assessment of Sargassum—associated biodiversity. Nevertheless, these approaches are labor intensive and require extensive replication in time and space to produce a reasonable assessment of the biodiversity associated with the Sargassum community.","PeriodicalId":36764,"journal":{"name":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3301.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the past decade unprecedented blooming of pelagic Sargassum has occurred across the Equatorial Atlantic from West Africa to the Caribbean. Although pelagic Sargassum mats are considered beneficial in the open ocean, providing valuable habitat for a diverse array of endemic and associated species, they also inundate coastal areas and cause a plethora of management challenges for fisheries, tourism, nearshore coastal ecosystems, public health and the socioeconomic welfare of coastal communities. In—water harvesting has been suggested as a desirable management solution to prevent shoreline inundation, but destruction of the associated biodiversity is a concern with this approach and has not been adequately examined. Furthermore, in—water harvesting methods within the Tropical Atlantic and Caribbean have been ad hoc and highly variable with no established sampling protocol. Here we review 30 published studies detailing methods to collect information on the biodiversity associated with pelagic Sargassum. Nets, hook and line, video recordings, bare—hands and plastic bags have all been used to collect epiphytic, clinging and free—swimming fauna associated with Sargassum. Net sampling was the predominant method; however, in the absence of a standardized approach a wide range of net types and sizes were used. Similarly, separation, identification and preservation methods were all unstandardized. This review highlights the need for standardization and provides the first set of guidelines for the collection and assessment of Sargassum—associated biodiversity. Nevertheless, these approaches are labor intensive and require extensive replication in time and space to produce a reasonable assessment of the biodiversity associated with the Sargassum community.
如何评估远洋马尾藻相关生物多样性?文学启示
在过去的十年里,从西非到加勒比海的赤道大西洋出现了前所未有的远洋马尾藻繁盛。尽管远洋马尾藻垫被认为对开放海洋有益,为各种特有物种和相关物种提供了宝贵的栖息地,但它们也淹没了沿海地区,并对渔业、旅游业、近岸沿海生态系统、公共卫生和沿海社区的社会经济福利造成了大量的管理挑战。水中收集已被建议为防止海岸线淹没的理想管理解决方案,但这种方法对相关生物多样性的破坏是一个问题,尚未得到充分审查。此外,热带大西洋和加勒比地区的水中收集方法是临时的,变化很大,没有确定的采样方案。本文回顾了30篇已发表的研究,详细介绍了收集与远洋马尾藻相关的生物多样性信息的方法。网、钩和线、录像、徒手和塑料袋都被用来收集与马尾藻有关的附生、附着和自由游动的动物。净抽样为主要方法;但是,由于没有标准化的办法,使用了各种各样的网的类型和大小。同样,分离、鉴定和保存方法也不规范。这篇综述强调了标准化的必要性,并为收集和评估马尾藻相关生物多样性提供了第一套指南。然而,这些方法是劳动密集型的,需要在时间和空间上进行大量的重复,才能对马尾藻群落的生物多样性进行合理的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH
GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信