Comparative Analysis of the Physical Education and Health Curriculum Standards between China and United States from the Perspective of Key Competencies

Guyue Zhang, Z. Yin
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Physical Education and Health Curriculum Standards between China and United States from the Perspective of Key Competencies","authors":"Guyue Zhang, Z. Yin","doi":"10.18122/ijpah.1.2.42.boisestate","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing world multipolarization, economic globalization, cultural diversity and social informatization, all countries in the world have adopted key competencies as an important part of education research. As a programmatic document of physical education in the new century, physical education and health curriculum standards play an important role in the demonstration and promotion of quality education. The purpose of this study was to compare the Chinese and United States (US) high school physical education and health curriculum standards from the perspective of key competencies. Using literature review, this study compared the high school physical education and health curriculum standards between China and US with five aspects: curriculum nature and concept, curriculum objectives, curriculum content, academic quality, and learning evaluation. The key competencies connotation of physical education and health curriculum standards in China and US are relatively consistent, both of which centered on improving and maintaining students' health and well-being, and were multidimensional including aspects of sports ability, sports cognition, healthy life, social behavior, emotional attitude and values; The standards structure of physical education and health curriculum in China appeared to be more complete (with specific focus on sports skills), the content scope was more detailed, the learning objectives needed to be more specific, the learning requirements were clear, but the learning evaluation still needed to be further enriched; The structure of the US physical education curriculum standards was relatively loose, had clear and multi-level learning goals, high learning requirements, operable evaluation content, with curriculum content focus on cultivating students' lifelong sports habits. We should firmly implement the guiding ideology of health first, adhere to the core quality of physical education, and emphasize the parallel relationship among sports ability, healthy behavior and physical education morality. However, we should not blindly pursue the average development in the specific teaching process. China should pay attention to the evaluation of physical education learning, further enrich its content, especially the evaluation methods and means of students' internal performance. We should correctly grasp the principle of \"tightening\" and \"relaxing\" when dealing with the key competencies, and attach importance to the on-the-job training of front-line physical education teachers.","PeriodicalId":73469,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physical activity and health","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physical activity and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18122/ijpah.1.2.42.boisestate","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing world multipolarization, economic globalization, cultural diversity and social informatization, all countries in the world have adopted key competencies as an important part of education research. As a programmatic document of physical education in the new century, physical education and health curriculum standards play an important role in the demonstration and promotion of quality education. The purpose of this study was to compare the Chinese and United States (US) high school physical education and health curriculum standards from the perspective of key competencies. Using literature review, this study compared the high school physical education and health curriculum standards between China and US with five aspects: curriculum nature and concept, curriculum objectives, curriculum content, academic quality, and learning evaluation. The key competencies connotation of physical education and health curriculum standards in China and US are relatively consistent, both of which centered on improving and maintaining students' health and well-being, and were multidimensional including aspects of sports ability, sports cognition, healthy life, social behavior, emotional attitude and values; The standards structure of physical education and health curriculum in China appeared to be more complete (with specific focus on sports skills), the content scope was more detailed, the learning objectives needed to be more specific, the learning requirements were clear, but the learning evaluation still needed to be further enriched; The structure of the US physical education curriculum standards was relatively loose, had clear and multi-level learning goals, high learning requirements, operable evaluation content, with curriculum content focus on cultivating students' lifelong sports habits. We should firmly implement the guiding ideology of health first, adhere to the core quality of physical education, and emphasize the parallel relationship among sports ability, healthy behavior and physical education morality. However, we should not blindly pursue the average development in the specific teaching process. China should pay attention to the evaluation of physical education learning, further enrich its content, especially the evaluation methods and means of students' internal performance. We should correctly grasp the principle of "tightening" and "relaxing" when dealing with the key competencies, and attach importance to the on-the-job training of front-line physical education teachers.
关键能力视角下的中美体育与健康课程标准比较分析
随着世界多极化、经济全球化、文化多样化和社会信息化的发展,世界各国都将关键能力作为教育研究的重要内容。体育与健康课程标准作为新世纪体育教育的纲领性文件,对素质教育的示范和促进具有重要作用。摘要本研究旨在从关键能力的角度比较中美高中体育与健康课程标准。采用文献法,从课程性质与理念、课程目标、课程内容、学业质量和学习评价五个方面对中美高中体育与健康课程标准进行了比较。中美两国体育与健康课程标准的关键能力内涵相对一致,都以提高和维护学生的健康和幸福为中心,是多维度的,包括运动能力、运动认知、健康生活、社会行为、情感态度和价值观等方面;中国体育与健康课程标准结构较为完善(以运动技能为重点),内容范围较为细化,学习目标需要更加具体,学习要求明确,但学习评价还有待进一步充实;美国体育课程标准结构相对宽松,学习目标清晰多层次,学习要求高,评价内容可操作性强,课程内容注重培养学生终身运动习惯。要牢固贯彻健康第一的指导思想,坚持体育教学的核心质量,强调运动能力、健康行为和体育道德三者的平行关系。但是,在具体的教学过程中,不能盲目追求平均发展。中国应重视体育学习的评价,进一步丰富其内容,特别是学生内在表现的评价方法和手段。在处理关键能力时要正确把握“紧”与“松”的原则,重视一线体育教师的在职培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信