Patterns of Dispersion, Movement and Feeding of the Sea Urchin Lytechinus variegatus, and the Potential Implications for Grazing Impact on Live Seagrass

IF 1.5 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
A. Parson, J. Dirnberger, Troy R. Mutchler
{"title":"Patterns of Dispersion, Movement and Feeding of the Sea Urchin Lytechinus variegatus, and the Potential Implications for Grazing Impact on Live Seagrass","authors":"A. Parson, J. Dirnberger, Troy R. Mutchler","doi":"10.18785/GCR.3201.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus is a known grazer of both living and dead tissue of turtlegrass, Thalassia testudinum, occasionally denuding large areas of seagrass. Field studies have attempted to assess effects of herbivory on seagrass by enclosing urchins at various densities. However, it is unclear how unrestricted urchins affect seagrass at lower densities more typically observed in the field. This study describes movement, feeding, and distribution of L. variegatus within beds of T. testudinum in St. Joseph Bay, Florida (USA) to quantify this urchin’s impact as a seagrass grazer. Urchins were absent from portions of seagrass beds closest to shore, present at low densities midway across the bed, and at highest densities (up to ~5 individuals/m2) at the offshore edge of the bed. Urchins tended not to aggregate, moved twice as rapidly where seagrass cover was reduced, and moved > 20X faster when placed in areas of open sand. Dead seagrass tissue occurred 4—30X more frequently on oral surfaces than living seagrass tissue. Fecal pellets with dead seagrass tissue were > 3X more common than pellets with live seagrass tissue. Injury to seagrass leaves was more common along dead leaf sections than live sections (> 2—10X). Overall, spatial distributions, movement, and diet indicate that L. variegatus at densities observed in this study would tend to have minimal effects on living seagrass. Episodic periods of denuding grassbeds reported in the literature suggest L. variegatus switches to live seagrass tissue as dead tissue becomes scarce during times of high urchin density.","PeriodicalId":36764,"journal":{"name":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18785/GCR.3201.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus is a known grazer of both living and dead tissue of turtlegrass, Thalassia testudinum, occasionally denuding large areas of seagrass. Field studies have attempted to assess effects of herbivory on seagrass by enclosing urchins at various densities. However, it is unclear how unrestricted urchins affect seagrass at lower densities more typically observed in the field. This study describes movement, feeding, and distribution of L. variegatus within beds of T. testudinum in St. Joseph Bay, Florida (USA) to quantify this urchin’s impact as a seagrass grazer. Urchins were absent from portions of seagrass beds closest to shore, present at low densities midway across the bed, and at highest densities (up to ~5 individuals/m2) at the offshore edge of the bed. Urchins tended not to aggregate, moved twice as rapidly where seagrass cover was reduced, and moved > 20X faster when placed in areas of open sand. Dead seagrass tissue occurred 4—30X more frequently on oral surfaces than living seagrass tissue. Fecal pellets with dead seagrass tissue were > 3X more common than pellets with live seagrass tissue. Injury to seagrass leaves was more common along dead leaf sections than live sections (> 2—10X). Overall, spatial distributions, movement, and diet indicate that L. variegatus at densities observed in this study would tend to have minimal effects on living seagrass. Episodic periods of denuding grassbeds reported in the literature suggest L. variegatus switches to live seagrass tissue as dead tissue becomes scarce during times of high urchin density.
海胆的分散、运动和摄食模式及其对活海草的潜在影响
海胆Lytechinus variegatus是一种以龟草(Thalassia testudinum)的活组织和死组织为食的动物,偶尔会剥落大面积的海草。实地研究试图通过圈养不同密度的海胆来评估草食对海草的影响。然而,目前尚不清楚不受限制的海胆如何影响在较低密度下更典型地在野外观察到的海草。本研究描述了在美国佛罗里达州圣约瑟夫湾(St. Joseph Bay)的T. testudinum床内,L. variegatus的运动、摄食和分布,以量化这种海胆作为海草食草动物的影响。海胆在最靠近海岸的部分海草床中不存在,在海草床的中间以低密度存在,在海草床的近海边缘密度最高(高达5只/m2)。海胆倾向于不聚集,在海草覆盖减少的地方移动速度是海胆的两倍,在开阔的沙滩上移动速度是海胆的20倍。死海草组织在口腔表面出现的频率是活海草组织的4 - 30倍。含有死海草组织的粪便颗粒比含有活海草组织的粪便颗粒常见50倍。海草叶片损伤沿死叶段比活叶段更常见(bb0 2 - 10倍)。总体而言,空间分布、移动和饮食表明,本研究中观察到的密度对活海草的影响很小。文献中报道的草地剥落的偶发期表明,在海胆密度高的时候,死组织变得稀缺,因此l.s variegatus会转向活的海草组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH
GULF AND CARIBBEAN RESEARCH Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信