{"title":"Early Limits of Local Decolonization in São Tomé and Príncipe: From Colonial Abuses to Postcolonial Disappointment, 1945–1976","authors":"A. Keese","doi":"10.18452/13581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The administration of Sao Tome's rural interior and of some coastal rural areas—home of at least one third of the archipelago's population—was mainly a two-man show in the early years after decolonization. While the crucial decisions about the future of the country's main economic activity and source of agricultural wealth (the cocoa plantations or rocas situated in these zones) were made at government level and in the president's office, and while these plantations formally had a strong degree of self-administration in the form of the Comissoes Administrativas Provisorias (Provisional Committees of Administration) later becoming the Comites de Accâo Politica (Committees of Political Action: both CAP), the control of everyday life lay in the hands of the labor inspectorate. Inspector-General Francisco Martins Xavier de Pina and his auxiliary, Americo Goncalves da Graca do Es pirito Santo, had an enormous task and held power over the lives of thousands of workers on the plantations. Both officials had been appointed during the transition phase before 12 July 1975, when Sâo Tome e Principe became an independent state.1 Struggling for a short time with the complicated bureaucratic heritage that had been left by the colonial admin istration, both officials rapidly established a routine of work. During 1976 the two officials were constantly active in visiting the different plantations, in hearing the complaints of laborers, plantation officials, and owners, and in processing information coming from the","PeriodicalId":45676,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":"44 1","pages":"373-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AFRICAN HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18452/13581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
The administration of Sao Tome's rural interior and of some coastal rural areas—home of at least one third of the archipelago's population—was mainly a two-man show in the early years after decolonization. While the crucial decisions about the future of the country's main economic activity and source of agricultural wealth (the cocoa plantations or rocas situated in these zones) were made at government level and in the president's office, and while these plantations formally had a strong degree of self-administration in the form of the Comissoes Administrativas Provisorias (Provisional Committees of Administration) later becoming the Comites de Accâo Politica (Committees of Political Action: both CAP), the control of everyday life lay in the hands of the labor inspectorate. Inspector-General Francisco Martins Xavier de Pina and his auxiliary, Americo Goncalves da Graca do Es pirito Santo, had an enormous task and held power over the lives of thousands of workers on the plantations. Both officials had been appointed during the transition phase before 12 July 1975, when Sâo Tome e Principe became an independent state.1 Struggling for a short time with the complicated bureaucratic heritage that had been left by the colonial admin istration, both officials rapidly established a routine of work. During 1976 the two officials were constantly active in visiting the different plantations, in hearing the complaints of laborers, plantation officials, and owners, and in processing information coming from the
在非殖民化后的最初几年,圣多美内陆农村和一些沿海农村地区(至少占该群岛三分之一人口的家园)的管理主要是两个人的表演。虽然关于国家主要经济活动和农业财富来源(位于这些地区的可可种植园或罗卡)的未来的关键决定是在政府一级和总统办公室做出的,虽然这些种植园在形式上以Comissoes Administrativas Provisorias(临时管理委员会)的形式具有很强的自我管理程度,但后来成为了Comites de acc o Politica(政治行动委员会):(两者都是CAP),日常生活的控制权掌握在劳动监察员手中。监察长弗朗西斯科·马丁斯·沙维尔·德·皮纳和他的助手Americo Goncalves da Graca do Es pirito Santo肩负着一项艰巨的任务,掌控着数千名种植园工人的生命。这两位官员都是在1975年7月12日多美和普林西比成为独立国家之前的过渡阶段任命的在与殖民政府遗留下来的复杂的官僚主义遗产斗争了很短的时间后,两位官员迅速建立了一套日常工作。1976年期间,这两位官员不断积极走访不同的种植园,听取劳工、种植园官员和种植园主的抱怨,并处理来自种植园的信息
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of African Historical Studies (IJAHS) is devoted to the study of the African past. Norman Bennett was the founder and guiding force behind the journal’s growth from its first incarnation at Boston University as African Historical Studies in 1968. He remained its editor for more than thirty years. The title was expanded to the International Journal of African Historical Studies in 1972, when Africana Publishers Holmes and Meier took over publication and distribution for the next decade. Beginning in 1982, the African Studies Center once again assumed full responsibility for production and distribution. Jean Hay served as the journal’s production editor from 1979 to 1995, and editor from 1998 to her retirement in 2005. Michael DiBlasi is the current editor, and James McCann and Diana Wylie are associate editors of the journal. Members of the editorial board include: Emmanuel Akyeampong, Peter Alegi, Misty Bastian, Sara Berry, Barbara Cooper, Marc Epprecht, Lidwien Kapteijns, Meredith McKittrick, Pashington Obang, David Schoenbrun, Heather Sharkey, Ann B. Stahl, John Thornton, and Rudolph Ware III. The journal publishes three issues each year (April, August, and December). Articles, notes, and documents submitted to the journal should be based on original research and framed in terms of historical analysis. Contributions in archaeology, history, anthropology, historical ecology, political science, political ecology, and economic history are welcome. Articles that highlight European administrators, settlers, or colonial policies should be submitted elsewhere, unless they deal substantially with interactions with (or the affects on) African societies.