Structural Balance and Signed International Relations

Q2 Social Sciences
P. Doreian, Andrej Mrvar
{"title":"Structural Balance and Signed International Relations","authors":"P. Doreian, Andrej Mrvar","doi":"10.21307/JOSS-2019-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We use balance theoretic ideas to study the dynamics of the international system of nations in a network of signed relations from 1946 through 1999. Using the Correlates of War data for this period, we apply pre-specified signed blockmodeling to characterize the fundamental structure of this network. Even though the system expanded greatly with many ties being created and/or destroyed, the basic structure remained the same but with new positions being added over time. The blockmodels generated temporal measures of imbalance, as did the counts of imbalanced triples. Regardless of using the line index of imbalance or the number of imbalanced 3-cycles, the results provided decisive evidence contradicting the balance theoretic hypothesis of signed networks moving towards balanced states. Structural balance theory remains very useful by pointing to the more important study of how and why signed networks move towards and away from balance at different points over time. Some major methodological problems for studying signed networks, regardless of whether they involve nations or human actors, were raised and addressed. Proposals for future research are suggested for modeling and understanding the dynamics of signed networks.","PeriodicalId":35236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Structure","volume":"16 1","pages":"1 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"90","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/JOSS-2019-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

Abstract

Abstract We use balance theoretic ideas to study the dynamics of the international system of nations in a network of signed relations from 1946 through 1999. Using the Correlates of War data for this period, we apply pre-specified signed blockmodeling to characterize the fundamental structure of this network. Even though the system expanded greatly with many ties being created and/or destroyed, the basic structure remained the same but with new positions being added over time. The blockmodels generated temporal measures of imbalance, as did the counts of imbalanced triples. Regardless of using the line index of imbalance or the number of imbalanced 3-cycles, the results provided decisive evidence contradicting the balance theoretic hypothesis of signed networks moving towards balanced states. Structural balance theory remains very useful by pointing to the more important study of how and why signed networks move towards and away from balance at different points over time. Some major methodological problems for studying signed networks, regardless of whether they involve nations or human actors, were raised and addressed. Proposals for future research are suggested for modeling and understanding the dynamics of signed networks.
结构平衡与签约国际关系
摘要:本文运用平衡理论的思想,从1946年到1999年,在一个签署关系网络中,研究了国际国家体系的动态。使用这一时期的战争数据的相关性,我们应用预先指定的签名块建模来表征该网络的基本结构。尽管随着许多关系的建立和/或破坏,这个系统大大扩展,但基本结构保持不变,只是随着时间的推移增加了新的位置。块模型生成了不平衡的时间度量,不平衡三元组的计数也是如此。无论使用不平衡线指数还是不平衡3圈数,结果都提供了与签名网络向平衡状态移动的平衡理论假设相矛盾的决定性证据。结构平衡理论仍然非常有用,它指出了更重要的研究,即签名网络如何以及为什么在不同的时间点走向和远离平衡。会议提出并讨论了研究签名网络的一些主要方法问题,无论它们是否涉及国家或人类行动者。提出了对签名网络动力学建模和理解的未来研究建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Social Structure
Journal of Social Structure Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信