VERIFIKASI UJI CEPAT KOMERSIAL Escherichia coli PADA CONTOH UJI DAGING SAPI BEKU (Verification of Escherichia coli Commercial Rapid Test Kit on Frozen Meat)

Yasmine Qurrota Ayunina, T. Purnawarman, S. Setiyaningsih
{"title":"VERIFIKASI UJI CEPAT KOMERSIAL Escherichia coli PADA CONTOH UJI DAGING SAPI BEKU (Verification of Escherichia coli Commercial Rapid Test Kit on Frozen Meat)","authors":"Yasmine Qurrota Ayunina, T. Purnawarman, S. Setiyaningsih","doi":"10.21157/J.KED.HEWAN.V10I2.5088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed to assess the performance and suitability of commercial rapid test compared to the conventional test through verification process. This study used frozen meat from laboratory routine samples which divided into five groups, those were: natural group, low bacteria level group, medium bacteria level group, high bacteria level group, and control group, each sample test performed 9 replicates. All samples were tested for E. coli by conventional method (SNI 2897:2008) and commercial rapid test method. E. coli test result from both methods was calculated as precision (relative standard deviation), sensitivity, specificity, false negative, false positive, and kappa. The results showed that the commercial kit test had good precision with relative standard deviations score was 0.103. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative, false positive, and kappa score were 94.44%, 100%, 5.56%, 0%, and 0.872, respectively, indicates an equal performance with conventional method. The t student test showed that commercial rapid test method and conventional method had suitability on natural group, low bacteria levels group and medium bacteria level group.","PeriodicalId":30999,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan","volume":"10 1","pages":"157-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21157/J.KED.HEWAN.V10I2.5088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study was aimed to assess the performance and suitability of commercial rapid test compared to the conventional test through verification process. This study used frozen meat from laboratory routine samples which divided into five groups, those were: natural group, low bacteria level group, medium bacteria level group, high bacteria level group, and control group, each sample test performed 9 replicates. All samples were tested for E. coli by conventional method (SNI 2897:2008) and commercial rapid test method. E. coli test result from both methods was calculated as precision (relative standard deviation), sensitivity, specificity, false negative, false positive, and kappa. The results showed that the commercial kit test had good precision with relative standard deviations score was 0.103. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative, false positive, and kappa score were 94.44%, 100%, 5.56%, 0%, and 0.872, respectively, indicates an equal performance with conventional method. The t student test showed that commercial rapid test method and conventional method had suitability on natural group, low bacteria levels group and medium bacteria level group.
冷冻肉大肠杆菌商品快速检测试剂盒的验证
本研究旨在通过验证过程来评估商业快速测试与常规测试的性能和适用性。本研究采用实验室常规冻肉样品,将冻肉分为5组,即天然组、低菌量组、中菌量组、高菌量组和对照组,每个样品试验9个重复。所有样品均采用常规方法(SNI 2897:2008)和商业快速检测方法进行大肠杆菌检测。计算两种方法的大肠杆菌检测结果的精密度(相对标准偏差)、灵敏度、特异性、假阴性、假阳性和kappa。结果表明,市售试剂盒检测精密度好,相对标准偏差评分为0.103。灵敏度为94.44%,特异度为100%,假阴性、假阳性和kappa评分分别为5.56%、0%和0.872,与传统方法效果相当。t学生试验表明,商业快速试验方法和常规试验方法对天然组、低菌量组和中等菌量组均有适宜性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信