Genomics education for medical specialists: case-based specialty workshops and blended learning

F. Maher, A. Nisselle, E. Lynch, M. Martyn, Rigan Tytherleigh, Taryn Charles, C. Gaff
{"title":"Genomics education for medical specialists: case-based specialty workshops and blended learning","authors":"F. Maher, A. Nisselle, E. Lynch, M. Martyn, Rigan Tytherleigh, Taryn Charles, C. Gaff","doi":"10.20517/jtgg.2023.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To develop and evaluate genomics education programs for health professionals to expedite the translation of genomics into healthcare. Methods: Our co-design team of genetic specialists, expert medical specialist peers, and genomics educators developed two continuing genomics education programs for health professionals: stand-alone, specialty-specific workshops and a generic blended learning course, combining online learning with workshops. Both programs referenced adult learning theories; workshops included case-based learning and expert peer-led discussion. Longitudinal surveys evaluated changes in confidence and understanding of genomic testing processes and clinical practice. Results: We delivered eleven specialty workshops (414 attendees) and a blended learning course comprising four self-directed online modules (61 users) and workshops (71 attendees) for mixed-specialty groups with adult, pediatric, or oncology cases. Surveys (214 workshops; 63 blended) showed that both programs significantly increased confidence and understanding of genomic testing processes. Blended learning participants showed additional gains in confidence after attending a workshop following online learning. Workshop discussions with experts were valued, particularly regarding interpreting and applying results. At follow-up, gains in confidence and understanding were maintained for both programs and 81% of respondents had performed a new genomics activity in clinical practice. Conclusion: Scalable education is needed. Our results suggest that specialty-specific genomics education may not be required to meet the needs of multiple specialties across a health system. Online learning can meet foundational learning needs but may not be sufficient to apply learning to practice. Blended learning offers flexible, continuing education pathways for dispersed national audiences as genomics becomes increasingly used across varied specialties.","PeriodicalId":73999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of translational genetics and genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of translational genetics and genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2023.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To develop and evaluate genomics education programs for health professionals to expedite the translation of genomics into healthcare. Methods: Our co-design team of genetic specialists, expert medical specialist peers, and genomics educators developed two continuing genomics education programs for health professionals: stand-alone, specialty-specific workshops and a generic blended learning course, combining online learning with workshops. Both programs referenced adult learning theories; workshops included case-based learning and expert peer-led discussion. Longitudinal surveys evaluated changes in confidence and understanding of genomic testing processes and clinical practice. Results: We delivered eleven specialty workshops (414 attendees) and a blended learning course comprising four self-directed online modules (61 users) and workshops (71 attendees) for mixed-specialty groups with adult, pediatric, or oncology cases. Surveys (214 workshops; 63 blended) showed that both programs significantly increased confidence and understanding of genomic testing processes. Blended learning participants showed additional gains in confidence after attending a workshop following online learning. Workshop discussions with experts were valued, particularly regarding interpreting and applying results. At follow-up, gains in confidence and understanding were maintained for both programs and 81% of respondents had performed a new genomics activity in clinical practice. Conclusion: Scalable education is needed. Our results suggest that specialty-specific genomics education may not be required to meet the needs of multiple specialties across a health system. Online learning can meet foundational learning needs but may not be sufficient to apply learning to practice. Blended learning offers flexible, continuing education pathways for dispersed national audiences as genomics becomes increasingly used across varied specialties.
医学专家的基因组学教育:基于案例的专业研讨会和混合学习
目的:为卫生专业人员制定和评估基因组学教育计划,以加快基因组学向医疗保健的转化。方法:我们的基因专家、医学专家同行和基因组学教育者共同设计团队为卫生专业人员开发了两个持续的基因组学教育计划:独立的、特定专业的讲习班和通用的混合学习课程,将在线学习与讲习班相结合。这两个节目都参考了成人学习理论;讲习班包括基于案例的学习和专家同行主导的讨论。纵向调查评估了对基因组检测过程和临床实践的信心和理解的变化。结果:我们提供了11个专业研讨会(414名参与者)和一个混合学习课程,包括四个自主在线模块(61名用户)和研讨会(71名参与者),适用于成人、儿科或肿瘤病例的混合专业群体。调查(214个工作坊;(63混合)表明,这两个项目都显著提高了对基因组测试过程的信心和理解。混合式学习的参与者在参加了在线学习之后的研讨会后,表现出了额外的信心增长。与专家的研讨会讨论受到重视,特别是关于解释和应用结果的讨论。在随访中,对两个项目的信心和理解都有所增加,81%的受访者在临床实践中进行了新的基因组学活动。结论:规模化教育是必要的。我们的研究结果表明,可能不需要专门的基因组学教育来满足卫生系统中多个专业的需求。在线学习可以满足基本的学习需求,但可能不足以将学习应用于实践。随着基因组学越来越多地应用于不同的专业,混合式学习为分散的国家受众提供了灵活的继续教育途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信