R. R. Martuci, A. Muench, Joel Bianchi, Leonardo Eloy Rodrigues Filho
{"title":"Resistência de união entre cimentos e liga de níquel-cromo, em função da ciclagem térmica e variações no procedimento de união","authors":"R. R. Martuci, A. Muench, Joel Bianchi, Leonardo Eloy Rodrigues Filho","doi":"10.1590/S0103-06631999000300011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated tensile bond strengths between a nickel-chromium alloy and cements at different times (one and 90 days) using or not thermocycling. Alloy used was Litecast B, and luting cements were Ketac-Cem, Vitremer, and Fluoride Enforce with three variations: a) only primer; b) with primer and bond; c) only with bond. Metallic discs with 6 mm diameter were cemented together and immersed in distilled water. Half specimens were thermocycled and half one not. Conclusions were: Ketac-Cem presented low bonding strength, being that of Vitremer very higher; the material Enforce when used only with primer increased adhesion with time but yet remained relatively low after 90 days; Enforce used with bond only achieved superior adhesion, still present specially with termocycling after 90 days; influence of thermocycling depends on adhesive system.","PeriodicalId":77611,"journal":{"name":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"13 1","pages":"269-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631999000300011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
We evaluated tensile bond strengths between a nickel-chromium alloy and cements at different times (one and 90 days) using or not thermocycling. Alloy used was Litecast B, and luting cements were Ketac-Cem, Vitremer, and Fluoride Enforce with three variations: a) only primer; b) with primer and bond; c) only with bond. Metallic discs with 6 mm diameter were cemented together and immersed in distilled water. Half specimens were thermocycled and half one not. Conclusions were: Ketac-Cem presented low bonding strength, being that of Vitremer very higher; the material Enforce when used only with primer increased adhesion with time but yet remained relatively low after 90 days; Enforce used with bond only achieved superior adhesion, still present specially with termocycling after 90 days; influence of thermocycling depends on adhesive system.
我们评估了镍铬合金与水泥在不同时间(1天和90天)使用或不使用热循环的拉伸结合强度。使用的合金为Litecast B,粘结剂为Ketac-Cem、Vitremer和氟化物强化剂,有三种变化:a)仅底漆;B)带底漆和粘结剂;C) only with bond。将直径为6毫米的金属盘粘合在一起,浸入蒸馏水中。一半的标本进行了热循环,一半没有。结论:Ketac-Cem的结合强度较低,而Vitremer的结合强度较高;仅与底漆一起使用时,材料的附着力随着时间的推移而增加,但在90天后仍然相对较低;仅与粘结剂配合使用,达到优异的附着力,90天后仍具有特殊的摩托车性能;热循环的影响取决于胶粘剂体系。