Efeitos da limpeza e dos cimentos retrobturadores na infiltração marginal de obturações retrógradas

N. Bernardineli
{"title":"Efeitos da limpeza e dos cimentos retrobturadores na infiltração marginal de obturações retrógradas","authors":"N. Bernardineli","doi":"10.1590/S0103-06631999000200007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement, Zoecim cement and EBA cement, as retrofolling material, when the cavity preparations were cleaned with saline solution, EDTA ans polyacrilic acid. Ninety extracted human single-rooted anterior teeth were instrumented ans obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha sealer. The apical 3 mm of each root was resected and 2 mm deep apical preparation cut. The root surfaces were coated and randomly allocated to nine groups of ten teeth and submitted to one of the experimental groups. The teeth were immersed em 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. After vertical sectioning, dye penetration was examined and the results were statistically analyzed. The microleakage has occurred in all groups and the glass ionomer cement was significantly better than EBA and Zoecim cement. When comparing EBA and Zoecim no differences were found. Regarding the cleaning procedures, the polyacrilic acid demonstrate a slight advantage when compared to EDTA and saline solution.","PeriodicalId":77611,"journal":{"name":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"13 1","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de odontologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-06631999000200007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement, Zoecim cement and EBA cement, as retrofolling material, when the cavity preparations were cleaned with saline solution, EDTA ans polyacrilic acid. Ninety extracted human single-rooted anterior teeth were instrumented ans obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha sealer. The apical 3 mm of each root was resected and 2 mm deep apical preparation cut. The root surfaces were coated and randomly allocated to nine groups of ten teeth and submitted to one of the experimental groups. The teeth were immersed em 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. After vertical sectioning, dye penetration was examined and the results were statistically analyzed. The microleakage has occurred in all groups and the glass ionomer cement was significantly better than EBA and Zoecim cement. When comparing EBA and Zoecim no differences were found. Regarding the cleaning procedures, the polyacrilic acid demonstrate a slight advantage when compared to EDTA and saline solution.
清洗和反充填水泥对逆行充填边缘渗透的影响
本研究的目的是比较玻璃离子水门汀、Zoecim水门汀和EBA水门汀作为回缩材料,在用生理盐水、EDTA和聚丙烯酸清洗空腔制剂时的密封能力。90颗拔除的人类单根前牙用侧边凝聚的杜仲胶封口剂进行固定和封闭。每根切除根尖3mm,切2mm深的根尖预备物。牙根表面涂有涂层,随机分为9组,每组10颗牙齿,并提交给其中一组实验组。牙体用2%亚甲基蓝溶液浸泡24小时。垂直切片后,检测染料穿透性,并对结果进行统计分析。所有组均发生微渗漏,玻璃离子水门汀明显优于EBA和Zoecim水门汀。比较EBA和Zoecim没有发现差异。关于清洗程序,与EDTA和生理盐水溶液相比,聚丙烯酸表现出轻微的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书