Sentinel node biopsy in early oral squamous cell carcinoma - a safe diagnostic and therapeutic procedure

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Fabrice N. Savaria, S. Stoeckli
{"title":"Sentinel node biopsy in early oral squamous cell carcinoma - a safe diagnostic and therapeutic procedure","authors":"Fabrice N. Savaria, S. Stoeckli","doi":"10.20517/2394-4722.2022.081701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is considered the standard surgical procedure for detecting occult neck node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in many centers around the world. Due to the fact that this method removes and evaluates the first lymph node(s) reached by the lymphatic flow from the tumor area, this has raised the question of whether SNB could also be considered a therapeutic procedure by targeted lymphadenectomy instead of elective neck dissection (END). Compared to END, its safety and low morbidity have been established. However, the surgical management of the clinical node-negative (cN0) neck in T1/T2 oral carcinoma has been under ongoing debate due to the lack of randomized studies comparing SNB to END in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and neck recurrence rates (NRRs). In the last years, two prospective randomized studies have proven with high-level evidence the noninferiority of SNB compared to END in terms of oncologic outcome while reducing costs and morbidity. In our opinion, SNB should be offered as the new standard therapeutic procedure in early OSCC.","PeriodicalId":15167,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.081701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is considered the standard surgical procedure for detecting occult neck node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in many centers around the world. Due to the fact that this method removes and evaluates the first lymph node(s) reached by the lymphatic flow from the tumor area, this has raised the question of whether SNB could also be considered a therapeutic procedure by targeted lymphadenectomy instead of elective neck dissection (END). Compared to END, its safety and low morbidity have been established. However, the surgical management of the clinical node-negative (cN0) neck in T1/T2 oral carcinoma has been under ongoing debate due to the lack of randomized studies comparing SNB to END in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and neck recurrence rates (NRRs). In the last years, two prospective randomized studies have proven with high-level evidence the noninferiority of SNB compared to END in terms of oncologic outcome while reducing costs and morbidity. In our opinion, SNB should be offered as the new standard therapeutic procedure in early OSCC.
早期口腔鳞状细胞癌的前哨淋巴结活检-一种安全的诊断和治疗方法
在世界各地的许多中心,前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)被认为是检测口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)隐匿性颈淋巴结转移的标准手术方法。由于该方法切除并评估了肿瘤区域淋巴流到达的第一个淋巴结,这就提出了一个问题,即SNB是否也可以考虑通过靶向淋巴结切除术而不是选择性颈部清扫(END)进行治疗。与END相比,其安全性和低发病率已得到证实。然而,由于缺乏比较SNB和END在总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和颈部复发率(NRRs)方面的随机研究,T1/T2口腔癌临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)颈部的手术治疗一直存在争议。在过去的几年中,两项前瞻性随机研究以高水平的证据证明了SNB与END相比在肿瘤预后方面的非劣效性,同时降低了成本和发病率。在我们看来,SNB应作为早期OSCC的新标准治疗程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
460
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信