Finding Groundwater in East and West

Elaheh Golzari, Péter Rabb
{"title":"Finding Groundwater in East and West","authors":"Elaheh Golzari, Péter Rabb","doi":"10.1556/096.2023.00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydraulic systems were built by ancient civilizations, notably the Persians and Romans, to deliver water to their residences where the water supply was scarce. Qanats were invented by the Persians to transfer water from aquifers to the surface, and aqueducts were built by the Romans to transport surface or underground water from its sources to distribution points in cities. Finding groundwater is a similarity between these two historical systems. This research compares ancient methods used by Persians and Romans to locate areas with abundant subsurface water. The oldest existing historical documents that recorded ancient ways of tracking groundwater, Al-Karaji’s treatise on qanats and Vitruvius’ treatise, were investigated with the qualitative content analysis method. As a result, historical means are divided into two categories in these two treatises including natural indications and practical tests. Natural indications consist of mountains and rocks, features of steppes, plants, vapours and dew, the whistles of the wind, and alluvial fans. An inverted container, a fleece of wool, an oil lamp, and a fire are instances of practical tests. Although these two treatises were authored over a ten-thousand-year interval and the structures of water systems differ, there are commonalities between ancient methods of tracing underground water.","PeriodicalId":40047,"journal":{"name":"Epites-Epiteszettudomany","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epites-Epiteszettudomany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/096.2023.00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydraulic systems were built by ancient civilizations, notably the Persians and Romans, to deliver water to their residences where the water supply was scarce. Qanats were invented by the Persians to transfer water from aquifers to the surface, and aqueducts were built by the Romans to transport surface or underground water from its sources to distribution points in cities. Finding groundwater is a similarity between these two historical systems. This research compares ancient methods used by Persians and Romans to locate areas with abundant subsurface water. The oldest existing historical documents that recorded ancient ways of tracking groundwater, Al-Karaji’s treatise on qanats and Vitruvius’ treatise, were investigated with the qualitative content analysis method. As a result, historical means are divided into two categories in these two treatises including natural indications and practical tests. Natural indications consist of mountains and rocks, features of steppes, plants, vapours and dew, the whistles of the wind, and alluvial fans. An inverted container, a fleece of wool, an oil lamp, and a fire are instances of practical tests. Although these two treatises were authored over a ten-thousand-year interval and the structures of water systems differ, there are commonalities between ancient methods of tracing underground water.
在东部和西部寻找地下水
水力系统是由古代文明建造的,尤其是波斯人和罗马人,用来给他们缺水的住所供水。波斯人发明了坎坎井,将地下蓄水层的水输送到地表;罗马人则建造了沟渠,将地表水或地下水从源头输送到城市的分配点。寻找地下水是这两个历史系统的相似之处。这项研究比较了波斯人和罗马人用来定位地下水丰富地区的古老方法。采用定性含量分析法对现存最古老的记录古代地下水追踪方法的历史文献Al-Karaji的《坎泉论》和Vitruvius的《坎泉论》进行了研究。因此,在这两篇论文中,历史手段被分为两类:自然指征和实际检验。自然迹象包括山脉和岩石、草原特征、植物、水汽和露水、风的呼啸声和冲积扇。一个倒置的容器、一根羊毛、一盏油灯和一堆火都是实际测试的例子。虽然这两篇论文的时间间隔超过一万年,而且水系的结构也不同,但古代地下水的追踪方法有共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epites-Epiteszettudomany
Epites-Epiteszettudomany Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal publishes studies contributed by the committees of the Department of Technological Sciences of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, on the fields of architectonics and architecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信