The Legacy of Soviet Monumental and Decorative Art (on the Example of Tselinograd, Republic of Kazakhstan)

Zhazira D. Zhukenova, Ardak Yussupova, Zhazira Zhekibayeva, Nazym Abileva, Farida Samarkanova
{"title":"The Legacy of Soviet Monumental and Decorative Art (on the Example of Tselinograd, Republic of Kazakhstan)","authors":"Zhazira D. Zhukenova, Ardak Yussupova, Zhazira Zhekibayeva, Nazym Abileva, Farida Samarkanova","doi":"10.1556/096.2023.00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of virgin lands (also known as tselina – previously uncultivated or unexplored areas of land, which have not been affected by humans and are typically located in rural or remote regions) has not only boosted the economy but influenced the development of art in Kazakhstan, particularly in Akmolinsk (in 1961 it was renamed Tselinograd, the current name of the city is Astana). Muralists M. Antonyuk and V. Tovtin made a significant contribution to the artistic and aesthetic image of Tselinograd. The purpose of the study is to identify the role of Soviet monumental and decorative art in designing the aesthetics of urban space and to substantiate its historical and cultural value. In this study, the features of stained-glass windows, marquetry, and monumental mosaics of Tselinograd were analysed. Their value as works of art was analysed, the specificities of incorporating national character are described, and their influence on the cultural development of the city is explained. The level of skill of the artists, including the ability to “embed” the artwork in the architectural image of the building is emphasised. The uniqueness of the monumental mosaics of the Soviet period is proved. Conclusions are drawn about their role as agitation. The need to preserve the works of monumental art for future generations is emphasised. This is an important part of the historical period – thoughtless “modernisation” of residential buildings, indifference to and devaluation of the artistic and cultural heritage of the Soviet past are not acceptable.","PeriodicalId":40047,"journal":{"name":"Epites-Epiteszettudomany","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epites-Epiteszettudomany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/096.2023.00085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of virgin lands (also known as tselina – previously uncultivated or unexplored areas of land, which have not been affected by humans and are typically located in rural or remote regions) has not only boosted the economy but influenced the development of art in Kazakhstan, particularly in Akmolinsk (in 1961 it was renamed Tselinograd, the current name of the city is Astana). Muralists M. Antonyuk and V. Tovtin made a significant contribution to the artistic and aesthetic image of Tselinograd. The purpose of the study is to identify the role of Soviet monumental and decorative art in designing the aesthetics of urban space and to substantiate its historical and cultural value. In this study, the features of stained-glass windows, marquetry, and monumental mosaics of Tselinograd were analysed. Their value as works of art was analysed, the specificities of incorporating national character are described, and their influence on the cultural development of the city is explained. The level of skill of the artists, including the ability to “embed” the artwork in the architectural image of the building is emphasised. The uniqueness of the monumental mosaics of the Soviet period is proved. Conclusions are drawn about their role as agitation. The need to preserve the works of monumental art for future generations is emphasised. This is an important part of the historical period – thoughtless “modernisation” of residential buildings, indifference to and devaluation of the artistic and cultural heritage of the Soviet past are not acceptable.
苏联纪念性和装饰性艺术的遗产(以哈萨克斯坦共和国策利诺格勒为例)
处女地(也被称为tselina -以前未开垦或未开发的土地,没有受到人类的影响,通常位于农村或偏远地区)的发展不仅促进了经济,而且影响了哈萨克斯坦的艺术发展,特别是在阿克莫林斯克(1961年更名为Tselinograd,现在的城市名称是阿斯塔纳)。壁画家M. Antonyuk和V. Tovtin对策利诺夫格勒的艺术和美学形象做出了重大贡献。本研究的目的是确定苏联纪念性和装饰性艺术在设计城市空间美学中的作用,并证实其历史和文化价值。在这项研究中,彩色玻璃窗的特点,镶嵌,和纪念碑马赛克的Tselinograd进行了分析。分析了它们作为艺术品的价值,描述了融入民族性的特殊性,并解释了它们对城市文化发展的影响。艺术家的技能水平,包括将艺术作品“嵌入”建筑形象的能力得到了强调。苏联时期纪念性马赛克的独特性得到了证明。结论是他们的作用是鼓动。为子孙后代保存不朽艺术作品的必要性得到了强调。这是历史时期的一个重要部分——轻率的住宅建筑“现代化”,对苏联过去的艺术和文化遗产的冷漠和贬值是不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epites-Epiteszettudomany
Epites-Epiteszettudomany Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal publishes studies contributed by the committees of the Department of Technological Sciences of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, on the fields of architectonics and architecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信