The suspension of suspensions: the “school form” and the “ skholé ” in times of pandemic

Q4 Social Sciences
Luiz Antonio Callegari Coppi
{"title":"The suspension of suspensions: the “school form” and the “ skholé ” in times of pandemic","authors":"Luiz Antonio Callegari Coppi","doi":"10.1590/s1678-4634202349265127eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Due to the moment’s urgency, the Covid-19 pandemic promoted the transposition of school activities originally planned for the face-to-face context to digital platforms. However, replacing the arena in which classes take place is not irrelevant, and this article intends to show how the technological characteristics of the applications used strain what, in recent centuries, has been understood as the school. To this end, we propose, firstly, a visit to the moment of the resurgence of the school during the Renaissance and the relationship of this event with a specific technology, Gutenberg’s movable type press — bookish knowledge, then establishes the school as a space different from family and social environments, giving rise to what is conventionally called “School Form.” From there, the article advances in the argument articulating this concept to that of skholé , which conceives the school as a space of suspension of the logic that binds children and young people to a fixed and unavoidable identity. This suspension allows them to disidentify from predetermined destinations and experience equality and self-experimentation. Finally, these concepts of “School Form” and skholé are contrasted with the conditions for performing remote teaching during the pandemic. Some questions are raised about what is expected of the school as a collective project.","PeriodicalId":35419,"journal":{"name":"Educacao e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349265127eng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Due to the moment’s urgency, the Covid-19 pandemic promoted the transposition of school activities originally planned for the face-to-face context to digital platforms. However, replacing the arena in which classes take place is not irrelevant, and this article intends to show how the technological characteristics of the applications used strain what, in recent centuries, has been understood as the school. To this end, we propose, firstly, a visit to the moment of the resurgence of the school during the Renaissance and the relationship of this event with a specific technology, Gutenberg’s movable type press — bookish knowledge, then establishes the school as a space different from family and social environments, giving rise to what is conventionally called “School Form.” From there, the article advances in the argument articulating this concept to that of skholé , which conceives the school as a space of suspension of the logic that binds children and young people to a fixed and unavoidable identity. This suspension allows them to disidentify from predetermined destinations and experience equality and self-experimentation. Finally, these concepts of “School Form” and skholé are contrasted with the conditions for performing remote teaching during the pandemic. Some questions are raised about what is expected of the school as a collective project.
停学:大流行时期的“学校形式”和“学校制度”
由于形势紧迫,2019冠状病毒病大流行促使原本计划的面对面学校活动转变为数字平台。然而,取代课堂发生的场所并非无关紧要,本文旨在展示所使用的应用程序的技术特征如何影响近几个世纪以来被理解为学校的东西。为此,我们建议,首先参观文艺复兴时期学校复兴的时刻,以及这一事件与特定技术的关系,古腾堡的活字印刷-书籍知识,然后将学校建立为一个不同于家庭和社会环境的空间,从而产生传统上所谓的“学校形式”。在此基础上,文章进一步将这一概念阐述为skhol的观点,后者认为学校是一个暂停逻辑的空间,将儿童和年轻人绑定在一个固定的和不可避免的身份上。这种暂停让他们脱离预定的目的地,体验平等和自我实验。最后,将这些“学校形式”和学校教学的概念与疫情期间进行远程教学的条件进行了对比。人们提出了一些问题,关于对学校作为一个集体项目的期望是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacao e Pesquisa
Educacao e Pesquisa Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: EDUCAÇÃO E PESQUISA é uma publicação quadrimestral da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo – FEUSP. Publicada desde 1975, a revista aceita artigos em português, francês, espanhol e inglês. Publica artigos inéditos na área de educação, em especial resultados de pesquisa de caráter teórico ou empírico, revisões da literatura de pesquisa educacional e reflexões críticas sobre experiências pedagógicas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信