Financial Innovation Management: Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth of the Baltic Countries

IF 1.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT
N. Slavinskaitė, Giedrė Lapinskienė, Roman Hlawiczka, Laszlo Vasa
{"title":"Financial Innovation Management: Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth of the Baltic Countries","authors":"N. Slavinskaitė, Giedrė Lapinskienė, Roman Hlawiczka, Laszlo Vasa","doi":"10.21272/mmi.2022.1-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management process of fiscal policy incorporates a wide analysis of various factors. The dynamic financial approach should be applied in deciding the level of centralization. The article offers the usage of the multicriteria method in selecting fiscal variables as a new instrument for financial evolution. In this article, the hypothesis of decentralization's impact on economic growth is tested to show the growth opportunities. The implications of the fiscal decentralization index on economic growth across the Baltic States for 2005-2017 were examined using a panel data approach with dynamic effects. The Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) are often considered as a single region with similar economic profiles and common political and social values. They are closely related geographically and historically, particularly during the Soviet era. Although their post-Soviet development has been similar, there are significant differences in local administrative systems and government finances. After restoring independence, the three Baltic countries have been reorganizing their public institutions according to western standards. Each country has some differences in organizing the management of local governments. The study's novelty is emphasized by supplementing the analysis with a fiscal decentralization index, including 24 fiscal decentralization indicators. The fiscal decentralization index ranges from 0.29 to 0.51. Lithuania (0,29) has the lowest fiscal decentralization index, the highest – Latvia (0.52) in the Baltic countries. The investigated model has revealed that the facts considered produce a statistically significant effect. Results showed a negative relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the Baltic States from 2005 to 2017. It should not be forgotten that, in some cases, regions are not capable of implementing green and inclusive growth without the influence of the central government.","PeriodicalId":45989,"journal":{"name":"Marketing and Management of Innovations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing and Management of Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.1-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The management process of fiscal policy incorporates a wide analysis of various factors. The dynamic financial approach should be applied in deciding the level of centralization. The article offers the usage of the multicriteria method in selecting fiscal variables as a new instrument for financial evolution. In this article, the hypothesis of decentralization's impact on economic growth is tested to show the growth opportunities. The implications of the fiscal decentralization index on economic growth across the Baltic States for 2005-2017 were examined using a panel data approach with dynamic effects. The Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) are often considered as a single region with similar economic profiles and common political and social values. They are closely related geographically and historically, particularly during the Soviet era. Although their post-Soviet development has been similar, there are significant differences in local administrative systems and government finances. After restoring independence, the three Baltic countries have been reorganizing their public institutions according to western standards. Each country has some differences in organizing the management of local governments. The study's novelty is emphasized by supplementing the analysis with a fiscal decentralization index, including 24 fiscal decentralization indicators. The fiscal decentralization index ranges from 0.29 to 0.51. Lithuania (0,29) has the lowest fiscal decentralization index, the highest – Latvia (0.52) in the Baltic countries. The investigated model has revealed that the facts considered produce a statistically significant effect. Results showed a negative relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the Baltic States from 2005 to 2017. It should not be forgotten that, in some cases, regions are not capable of implementing green and inclusive growth without the influence of the central government.
金融创新管理:财政分权对波罗的海国家经济增长的影响
财政政策的管理过程包含了对各种因素的广泛分析。在决定中央集权程度时应采用动态财务方法。本文提出了运用多标准方法选择财政变量作为金融演变的新工具。本文对分权对经济增长影响的假设进行了检验,以展示分权对经济增长的影响。本文采用具有动态效应的面板数据方法研究了2005-2017年财政分权指数对波罗的海国家经济增长的影响。波罗的海国家(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛)通常被认为是一个具有相似经济概况和共同政治和社会价值的单一区域。它们在地理和历史上密切相关,特别是在苏联时代。虽然它们在苏联解体后的发展是相似的,但在地方行政制度和政府财政方面存在显著差异。在恢复独立后,波罗的海三国一直在按照西方标准重组其公共机构。每个国家在组织地方政府管理方面都有一些差异。本研究的新颖性在于补充了财政分权指数,该指数包括24个财政分权指标。财政分权指数在0.29 ~ 0.51之间。在波罗的海国家中,立陶宛(0.29)的财政分权指数最低,拉脱维亚(0.52)最高。所调查的模型显示,所考虑的事实产生统计上显著的影响。结果显示,2005 - 2017年,波罗的海国家财政分权与经济增长呈负相关。不应忘记,在某些情况下,如果没有中央政府的影响,地方无法实现绿色和包容性增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信