Validation of an evaluation instrument for the flipped classroom active methodology

Q4 Social Sciences
Dionara Guarda, G. Gehlen, Gimene Cardozo Braga, Albimara Hey
{"title":"Validation of an evaluation instrument for the flipped classroom active methodology","authors":"Dionara Guarda, G. Gehlen, Gimene Cardozo Braga, Albimara Hey","doi":"10.1590/s1678-4634202349248000eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Active methodologies are understood as ways to develop the learning process and construct critical training with future professionals in the most diverse areas, favoring the autonomy of the student in their learning, ecouraging individual and collective decision-making. The objective of this study, as well as its methodological path, seeks to validate the evaluation instrument used in the Flipped Classroom Active Methodology. Developed by teachers of the nursing course and based on bloom taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain, the instrument contains twenty items to be evaluated. For validation, the psychometric properties of validity and reliability related to Pasquali’s psychometry were used. Verified through the Content Validity Index (CVI), it measures the proportion of evaluators who are in agreement with the instrument’s items, using an agreement of at least 80% among the evaluators as a decision criterion on the pertinence and acceptance of the item. The instrument was evaluated by 8 participants considered experienced in the area, using a 4-point Likert scale. The reliability criterion, analyzed using the IBM SPSS® software, presented a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.94 and the validity criterion reached 70% agreement between the evaluators. It is concluded that the instrument is reliable, however, regarding the validity criterion, it needs adjustments to represent what it intends.","PeriodicalId":35419,"journal":{"name":"Educacao e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349248000eng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Active methodologies are understood as ways to develop the learning process and construct critical training with future professionals in the most diverse areas, favoring the autonomy of the student in their learning, ecouraging individual and collective decision-making. The objective of this study, as well as its methodological path, seeks to validate the evaluation instrument used in the Flipped Classroom Active Methodology. Developed by teachers of the nursing course and based on bloom taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain, the instrument contains twenty items to be evaluated. For validation, the psychometric properties of validity and reliability related to Pasquali’s psychometry were used. Verified through the Content Validity Index (CVI), it measures the proportion of evaluators who are in agreement with the instrument’s items, using an agreement of at least 80% among the evaluators as a decision criterion on the pertinence and acceptance of the item. The instrument was evaluated by 8 participants considered experienced in the area, using a 4-point Likert scale. The reliability criterion, analyzed using the IBM SPSS® software, presented a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.94 and the validity criterion reached 70% agreement between the evaluators. It is concluded that the instrument is reliable, however, regarding the validity criterion, it needs adjustments to represent what it intends.
翻转课堂主动教学法评估工具的验证
主动方法被理解为发展学习过程的方法,并与最多样化领域的未来专业人员一起构建批判性培训,有利于学生在学习中的自主性,鼓励个人和集体决策。本研究的目的,以及它的方法路径,试图验证在翻转课堂积极方法中使用的评估工具。该量表由护理课程教师开发,基于认知领域的bloom分类法,包含20个评估项目。为了验证,我们使用了与帕斯夸里心理测量相关的效度和信度的心理测量特性。通过内容效度指数(Content Validity Index, CVI)进行验证,它衡量与仪器项目一致的评估者的比例,使用评估者之间至少80%的一致性作为项目的针对性和可接受性的决策标准。该仪器由8名被认为在该领域经验丰富的参与者使用4点李克特量表进行评估。信度标准采用IBM SPSS®软件进行分析,其Cronbach 's alpha值为0.94,效度标准在评估者之间的一致性达到70%。结论是,该工具是可靠的,然而,关于有效性标准,它需要调整,以代表它的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacao e Pesquisa
Educacao e Pesquisa Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: EDUCAÇÃO E PESQUISA é uma publicação quadrimestral da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo – FEUSP. Publicada desde 1975, a revista aceita artigos em português, francês, espanhol e inglês. Publica artigos inéditos na área de educação, em especial resultados de pesquisa de caráter teórico ou empírico, revisões da literatura de pesquisa educacional e reflexões críticas sobre experiências pedagógicas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信